From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 1 Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:21:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: References: <20140901230728.GM29327@sirena.org.uk> <1627064.QhxvejlWdk@amdc1032> <20140904171123.GD26364@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140909003729.GA11706@mtj.dyndns.org> <20140910150447.GV30828@titan.lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.80]:40875 "EHLO qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770AbaIJQVj (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:21:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: Jason Cooper , Thomas Gleixner , Tejun Heo , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Mark Brown , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Kyungmin Park On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > And I did ask for a clarification on the proposed fix which produced no > answer so far. What clarification is needed?