From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: Build failures in -next due to use of __hrtimer_start_range_ns arm-ccn.c Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:13:45 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20150513145101.GU2761@sirena.org.uk> <1431529683.3285.101.camel@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:33115 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934420AbbEMPNg (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 May 2015 11:13:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1431529683.3285.101.camel@arm.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pawel Moll Cc: Mark Brown , "kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Wed, 13 May 2015, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 15:51 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:34:48PM +0100, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > arm64-allmodconfig > > > ../drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c:924:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > > > arm-allmodconfig > > > ../drivers/bus/arm-ccn.c:924:3: error: implicit declaration of function '__hrtimer_start_range_ns' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > > Today's -next fails to build both arm and arm64 allmodconfig due to the > > above errors, introduced in commit ffa415245b8666c44d (bus: arm-ccn: > > cpumask attribute). Judging from the name of the symbol it appears that > > the code is peering into hrtimer implementation details and indeed it > > was removed in commit 58f1f803f1d6ef9 (hrtimer: Get rid of > > __hrtimer_start_range_ns()) which has a commit message suggsting that > > this has indeed been explicitly removed and no new references should be > > added. > > Right, the fix will be equivalent to > 576b0704c9def6d54b3ae9e13b0b7567c713f568 "x86: perf: uncore: Use > hrtimer_start()" > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=142904610220085 > > Will post it in a second, but not sure who should take it? The arm-soc > guys, as an additional ccn patch, or Thomas as part of his series? Route it through the same tree as the commit which introduces the __hrtimer_start_range_ns usage Thanks, tglx