From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 10:32:09 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1205141031140.3231@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120514065747.D73403E0532@localhost>
On Mon, 14 May 2012, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2012 10:50:25 +1000, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > Building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "irq_to_desc" [drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.ko] undefined!
> >
> > This has been reported elsewhere by DaveM.
> >
> > Caused by commit df9541a60af0 ("gpio: pch9: Use proper flow type handlers").
> >
> > I have reverted that commit for today.
>
> Gah, I tested that patch with CONFIG_GPIO_PCH=Y, but not as a module.
> I see three options here; revert the patch now and fix it up in v3.4,
> add exports for those two symbols, or disable building that code as a
> module (patch below). Personally I prefer the third option for the
> immediate fix.
I was about to queue the exports, but this one is good as well.
Thanks,
tglx
> g.
>
> >From 7fd0fcff9f0d65734415fed756271c1ae2267666 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 00:52:49 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] gpio/pch: Fix build failure when selected as a module
>
> x86_64 allmodconfig fails like this:
>
> ERROR: "handle_edge_irq" [drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "irq_to_desc" [drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.ko] undefined!
>
> This patch fixes the issue by not allowing gpio-pch.c to be built as a
> module. It can be reenabled when the core interrupt handling code
> exports the missing symbols, but that change needs some review first.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index e03653d..db146d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ config GPIO_LANGWELL
> Say Y here to support Intel Langwell/Penwell GPIO.
>
> config GPIO_PCH
> - tristate "Intel EG20T PCH/LAPIS Semiconductor IOH(ML7223/ML7831) GPIO"
> + bool "Intel EG20T PCH/LAPIS Semiconductor IOH(ML7223/ML7831) GPIO"
> depends on PCI && X86
> select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> help
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-14 0:50 linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-14 6:57 ` Grant Likely
2012-05-14 8:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-27 22:01 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-27 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-27 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-27 23:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-05 4:54 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-05 9:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2021-11-05 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 1:02 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-06 5:57 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-14 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20 6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-20 12:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-07-22 23:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-23 7:40 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-23 23:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-24 0:23 ` Daniel Axtens
2020-11-25 2:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-21 2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-20 11:46 linux-next: build failure in Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-28 8:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-18 22:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-05 1:22 linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-05 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-09 21:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-09 21:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-09 22:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-09 23:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-10 2:00 ` Zenghui Yu
2018-10-28 22:45 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-28 22:35 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-28 22:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-10-29 1:38 ` Hangbin Liu
2018-10-29 2:17 ` David Miller
2018-06-12 2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 3:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-04 22:28 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-17 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-27 6:06 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-28 20:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-11-03 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2014-11-03 4:16 ` David Miller
2012-07-27 0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-27 0:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-27 1:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-06-14 1:47 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-14 3:06 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-14 3:40 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 0:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-15 0:56 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-17 23:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-06-18 4:58 ` Paul Mundt
2012-06-15 9:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2012-06-15 10:15 ` Sedat Dilek
2012-06-15 8:46 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2012-06-15 11:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-07 0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-07 0:10 ` Al Viro
2012-04-19 0:41 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-24 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 22:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-29 22:50 ` James Bottomley
2011-08-11 1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-11 6:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-26 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20 1:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-17 23:29 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-17 23:35 ` Luck, Tony
2011-01-14 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-19 3:12 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-01-19 4:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-13 23:43 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-14 1:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-01-14 2:17 ` Al Viro
2010-12-21 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-21 4:47 ` Sedat Dilek
2010-10-06 0:09 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-28 0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-28 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-30 0:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-01 17:04 ` Tony Luck
2010-06-01 17:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-24 0:40 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1205141031140.3231@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jeff.dagenais@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).