From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 6 (hid) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 11:33:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <20130306115052.2b1969acb7b7a0fa35975984@canb.auug.org.au> <51379849.6040903@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54475 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752909Ab3CGKdN (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 05:33:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin Tissoires Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > You should have at least one other patch for hid-mt: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2193641/ Ah, right, that one is in my queue as well, sorry for not mentioning it in my previous post. That doesn't remove the direct call either though. > And I sent as a RFC the patch I was talking about: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2193801/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2193821/ > > These two RFCs have been reviewed by David Herrmann, so maybe we can > include them in their current form as no one else complained about it > ( maybe you will :) ). For some reason these two vanished between the cracks of my mailbox. Thanks for pointing those out, I will process them today and either apply it, or fix it for -next by adding a config dependency. -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs