linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-next: Tree for Jun 1] __khugepaged_exit rwsem_down_write_failed lockup
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:19:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f136aef3-95c8-4394-3626-cd5bb4d04fbd@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160603151001.GG29930@redhat.com>

On 06/03/2016 05:10 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Hello Michal,
>
> CC'ed Hugh,
>
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:46:00PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> What do you think about the external dependencies mentioned above. Do
>> you think this is a sufficient argument wrt. occasional higher
>> latencies?
>
> It's a tradeoff and both latencies would be short and uncommon so it's
> hard to tell.

Shouldn't it be possible to do a mmput() before the hugepage allocation, 
and then again mmget_not_zero()? That way it's no longer a tradeoff?

> There's also mmput_async for paths that may care about mmput
> latencies. Exit itself cannot use it, it's mostly for people taking
> the mm_users pin that may not want to wait for mmput to run. It also
> shouldn't happen that often, it's a slow path.
>
> The whole model inherited from KSM is to deliberately depend only on
> the mmap_sem + test_exit + mm_count, and never on mm_users, which to
> me in principle doesn't sound bad. I consider KSM version a
> "finegrined" implementation but I never thought it would be a problem
> to wait a bit in exit() in case the slow path hits. I thought it was
> more of a problem if exit() runs, the parent then start a new task but
> the memory wasn't freed yet.
>
> So I would suggest Hugh to share his view on the down_write/up_write
> that may temporarily block mmput (until the next test_exit bailout
> point) vs higher latency in reaching exit_mmap for a real exit(2) that
> would happen with the proposed change.
>
> Thanks!
> Andrea
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01  3:11 linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-02  1:48 ` [linux-next: Tree for Jun 1] __khugepaged_exit rwsem_down_write_failed lockup Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-02  9:21   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-02 12:08     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-02 12:21       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 13:51         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-03 14:46           ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 15:10             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-06-07  7:34               ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08  8:19               ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2016-06-03  7:15     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-03  7:25       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03  8:43         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-03  9:55           ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 10:05             ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 13:38               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-03 13:45                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-03 13:49                   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-04  7:51                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-06  8:39                       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-02 13:24   ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-02 18:58     ` Ebru Akagunduz
2016-06-03  1:00       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-03  1:29         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-03  4:14           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-06-03 12:28     ` [PATCH] mm, thp: fix locking inconsistency in collapse_huge_page Ebru Akagunduz
2016-06-06 13:05       ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-06-09  3:51         ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f136aef3-95c8-4394-3626-cd5bb4d04fbd@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --subject='Re: [linux-next: Tree for Jun 1] __khugepaged_exit rwsem_down_write_failed lockup' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox