From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f47.google.com (mail-pj1-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96456BA43 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 03:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.dk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="MY+qp0Bp" Received: by mail-pj1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2866b15b013so78313a91.0 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 19:11:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1703128296; x=1703733096; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KJGWqnKkED1hJpeni+YHiuU7Mhp9gSuLu448hu9J98U=; b=MY+qp0BpYyEyMJrBQGRiMixw43CX2HASjPWhOuySXpGiY7aefOUQPnxjrimINjwlLJ l3TEE7NerCPhgFgvuOvzomePvKIhNofiGvbtzMOgbq8y82Fc+x8svdFfeYbC0xjKvNir 8Iat1ZZHgDOKIGXaQcvoztihuNqsNUvvCSj6qIA2wezaiuboOkW8z9NImeVwtBMMymZn 0diN+ilSS5i9rCSd9laggphN373rg64Pt6w1BkcxWmo9JNFNxqepuholBXdqII113HLb BjaZ/IGhzWY/f4V8NoDtX0Tp8rMzUpQ9iUnZ1jaJamDmR3NjzqUbW+J2DC/oTFjx6CVG 661Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703128296; x=1703733096; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=KJGWqnKkED1hJpeni+YHiuU7Mhp9gSuLu448hu9J98U=; b=FQ4+ojxSU+9a0Ph9zqJF7axLWnf67FLufnCLMIPKKdjD65jaRyAWsRlte0tJ+NSXj0 7QT8BX4P6cI+KDgKn28OX1+FSKeAsMQuW4bF0dtJ6Qikyfj1yqSNAh4Gx+fqCcrPAOCy W+lxwoap5S3SrzA/00BbA5aer7pSAOxWUWN+cvG/k4+ejkNBe9F0JAwpCmA1W5Bmmw83 rcodyQh7iLhe3tMcXKs8UciO4+jMRLpz2RWbBDAzlNGssweLjDhb1xH56axSpd71pRE3 IPhy8URIqc4MYIWCKCDSOMWZUoPWQ5qvcFGgtUfuC9jwVEPzQFJ5j8phzVKkyxBAoZg+ yQ9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzZ9NcYDpLHjueH25Q9SpRqw7O+uL9iLC2N6KtoCA34REyv+oeV lJGTHAxBAUebLfXlnTGpIrd93f8o5JF3ed/Qi2/v4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESh8XuIQzCEHk/nXBpum4j6GDE9hW2b/CpTgDPwLxAg0c/DRNxWgVxCaJzSFXzarydux9ovg== X-Received: by 2002:a62:844a:0:b0:6d9:5c18:ad96 with SMTP id k71-20020a62844a000000b006d95c18ad96mr3974492pfd.0.1703128295843; Wed, 20 Dec 2023 19:11:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.150] ([198.8.77.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u3-20020a056a00124300b006ce39a397b9sm476306pfi.48.2023.12.20.19.11.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Dec 2023 19:11:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:11:34 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the block tree Content-Language: en-US To: Stephen Rothwell , Christian Brauner Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List References: <20231221135602.12bf82f5@canb.auug.org.au> From: Jens Axboe In-Reply-To: <20231221135602.12bf82f5@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/20/23 7:56 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in the vfs-brauner tree as different > commits (but the same patches): > > 24fa3ae9467f ("file: remove pointless wrapper") > 253ca8678d30 ("Improve __fget_files_rcu() code generation (and thus __fget_light())") > 372a34e66fb7 ("fs: replace f_rcuhead with f_task_work") > 4e94ddfe2aab ("file: remove __receive_fd()") > 7cb537b6f6d7 ("file: massage cleanup of files that failed to open") > a88c955fcfb4 ("file: s/close_fd_get_file()/file_close_fd()/g") > eac9189c9619 ("file: stop exposing receive_fd_user()") Hmm confused, assumed vfs.file got rebased again, but doesn't look to be the case. Christian? -- Jens Axboe