From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:21:30 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20180201125512.7bc96674@canb.auug.org.au> <20180201104707.GA21802@cbox> <20180202002227.36db3356@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41732 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751514AbeBAOVe (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 09:21:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180202002227.36db3356@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell , Christoffer Dall Cc: =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= , KVM , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Marc Zyngier On 01/02/2018 08:22, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:47:07 +0100 Christoffer Dall wrote: >> >> While the suggested fix is functional it does result in some code >> duplication, and the better resolution is the following: > > OK, I will use that resolution form tomorrow on. > > Someone needs to remember to let Linus know when the pull request is > sent. It should be fixed in the KVM tree before it reaches Linus (when we merge a topic branch that is common between x86/pti & KVM). Thanks, Paolo