From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
david.vrabel@citrix.com,
Xen Devel <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:58:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f4966105-a8ff-c24c-608c-9aff66ad956b@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160726140145.63ef0519@canb.auug.org.au>
On 07/26/2016 12:01 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 4c9075835511 ("xen/x86: Move irq allocation from Xen smp_op.cpu_up()")
>
> from the tip tree and commit:
>
> 88e957d6e47f ("xen: introduce xen_vcpu_id mapping")
>
> from the xen-tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thank you Stephen. Both this and arch/x86/xen/smp.c merges (from another
message) look good.
-boris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 4:01 linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-26 13:58 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-28 6:16 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31 4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31 4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31 8:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 9:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-31 12:36 ` Joe Perches
2017-08-31 10:11 ` Juergen Gross
2017-08-31 12:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 14:01 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-08-31 14:03 ` Juergen Gross
2017-08-31 18:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-28 5:20 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-17 4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-28 4:21 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-26 4:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29 3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29 3:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29 3:35 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29 8:37 ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-29 9:28 ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29 10:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-04-03 14:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-03 14:55 ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29 9:54 ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-29 11:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-03 1:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-26 4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18 6:17 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-02 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-29 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-12 5:09 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-12 13:27 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 17:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 18:17 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 18:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-12 18:30 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 18:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-08-12 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 18:44 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 19:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-13 6:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-20 4:15 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f4966105-a8ff-c24c-608c-9aff66ad956b@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).