From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:59:09 -0700
Message-ID: <m1zkzwdg7m.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
References: <20100518164520.7e9652b1.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
	<m1hbm5f0d2.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> <20100518212502.GB31331@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:45443 "EHLO
	out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752633Ab0ERV7S (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 18 May 2010 17:59:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20100518212502.GB31331@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Tue\, 18 May 2010 14\:25\:02 -0700")
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:

> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:58:33PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> Greg this fixes the conflict with the vfs tree we see in linux-next.
>
> Thanks, I can apply this to my tree right now, right?

Yes it is safe to apply to your tree right now.  Apologies if that
wasn't clear.

Eric