From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound tree
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 08:04:45 +0200
Message-ID: <s5haan9ngg2.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
References: <20100923124445.a2b5de42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100923124445.a2b5de42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

At Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:44:45 +1000,
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> Hi Takashi,
> 
> After merging the sound tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> sound/soc/soc-cache.c: In function 'snd_soc_8_16_write':
> sound/soc/soc-cache.c:207: error: 'struct snd_soc_codec' has no member named 'reg_cache_size'
> 
> Caused by commit 0077ca0b5c986477e33451b797b6e7dc92a8bbc0 ("ASoC: Fix
> multi-componentism") which looks like it was fixing something that didn't
> need fixing (or maybe fixed it incorrectly)?  This commit is not in the
> sound-asoc tree (but the commit it purports to be fixing is in both the
> sound and sound-asoc trees) ...
> 

Ah, this was a quick fix for 2.6.36, but it needs to be reverted again
for 2.6.37.  for-next branch contains 2.6.37 patches, thus it got
broken.  I fixed now.  Mark, could you pull topic/asoc branch on my tree?

Sorry for inconvenience.


Takashi