From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED71C43387 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380A8217D8 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="xO5UOfdr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729184AbeLTPrf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:47:35 -0500 Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:50214 "EHLO userp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727994AbeLTPrf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:47:35 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBKFiTuG096877; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:47:29 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=amhVyz0LaqN5QMQfqin48ibSMyh2gDmc++DSohUMaQc=; b=xO5UOfdrrCIFyzWYK6YDfDAbh6hJvv3LObmG1fWde52gMpsmygm07dtnYBo/HO56n93E GK2zVaQgt8Nia1hR+AlfbaYFj7PGh4xr9H9x8ZSs69QiD/ENUw6swXFTOwtyJWkZKmri bvdDLKZ1l8UjGzDHejedblObWuLNT7FvgIzPws2SaLGa0+dJoDWvm4vZ6xydAhoKEp43 Vxkj6lOtfTO0LPmD4XCupPK7/HTxMgWol22GzM3nZeMBIuTzZiExrLpNWRac+Hn1eNL3 e8hFBmXKdl0mDrxINNY2NRe13mPWpog1oVVqOaF+/xiwRxf/t4bXtmrluQXcTxVzeXD5 lA== Received: from aserv0021.oracle.com (aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2pfh3a7y9s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:47:29 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBKFlSv9006751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:47:28 GMT Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBKFlR6a015496; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:47:27 GMT Received: from anon-dhcp-171.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 07:47:27 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: convert unnecessary GFP_ATOMIC to GFP_NOFS From: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <20181220154236.GC6063@fieldses.org> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:47:25 -0500 Cc: Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <09BE8CC3-B528-45BA-B10E-01D7F9FD264D@oracle.com> References: <20181220153511.GB6063@fieldses.org> <20181220154236.GC6063@fieldses.org> To: Bruce Fields X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9113 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=935 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812200128 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org > On Dec 20, 2018, at 10:42 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > From: "J. Bruce Fields" > > It's OK to sleep here, we just don't want to recurse into the filesystem > as this writeout could be waiting on this. "as a writeout" > Future work: the documentation for GFP_NOFS says "Please try to avoid > using this flag directly and instead use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} to > mark the whole scope which cannot/shouldn't recurse into the FS layer > with a short explanation why. All allocation requests will inherit > GFP_NOFS implicitly." > > But I'm not sure where to do this. Should the workqueue be arranging > that for us in the case of workqueues created with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM? There seem to be plenty of uses of GFP_NOFS in NFS and sunrpc. That sounds like a big project. > Reported-by: Trond Myklebust > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields > --- > net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Also, I've still got this one. (And still haven't looked into whether > it should be using a memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} elsewhere instead.) > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c > index 08b5fa4a2852..41a971ac1c63 100644 > --- a/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c > +++ b/net/sunrpc/rpcb_clnt.c > @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ void rpcb_getport_async(struct rpc_task *task) > goto bailout_nofree; > } > > - map = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rpcbind_args), GFP_ATOMIC); > + map = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rpcbind_args), GFP_NOFS); > if (!map) { > status = -ENOMEM; > dprintk("RPC: %5u %s: no memory available\n", > @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ void rpcb_getport_async(struct rpc_task *task) > case RPCBVERS_4: > case RPCBVERS_3: > map->r_netid = xprt->address_strings[RPC_DISPLAY_NETID]; > - map->r_addr = rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(sap, GFP_ATOMIC); > + map->r_addr = rpc_sockaddr2uaddr(sap, GFP_NOFS); > if (!map->r_addr) { > status = -ENOMEM; > dprintk("RPC: %5u %s: no memory available\n", > -- > 2.19.2 > -- Chuck Lever