From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] SUNRPC: Ensure XPRT_CONNECTED is cleared while handling TCP RST
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 14:56:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1544644581.3750.4.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99a88b32d140228d5382eb176d0f19df27483654.camel@hammerspace.com>
On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 18:02 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 12:47 -0500, Dave Wysochanski wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 16:56 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-12-12 at 08:51 -0500, Dave Wysochanski wrote:
> > > > Commit 9b30889c548a changed the handling of TCP_CLOSE inside
> > > > xs_tcp_state_change. Prior to this change, the XPRT_CONNECTED
> > > > bit
> > > > was cleared unconditionally inside xprt_disconnect_done,
> > > > similar
> > > > to the handling of TCP_CLOSE_WAIT. After the change the
> > > > clearing
> > > > of XPRT_CONNECTED depends on successfully queueing a work based
> > > > xprt_autoclose which depends on XPRT_LOCKED and may not happen.
> > > > This is significant in the case of an unexpected RST from the
> > > > server, as the client will only see xs_tcp_state_change called
> > > > with
> > > > sk_state == TCP_CLOSE. Restore the unconditional clear_bit on
> > > > XPRT_CONNECTED while handling TCP_CLOSE and make it consistent
> > > > with handling TCP_CLOSE_WAIT.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 1 +
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> > > > index 8a5e823e0b33..b9789036051d 100644
> > > > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> > > > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> > > > @@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ static void xs_tcp_state_change(struct
> > > > sock
> > > > *sk)
> > > > if (sk->sk_err)
> > > > xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, -sk-
> > > > > sk_err);
> > > >
> > > > /* Trigger the socket release */
> > > > + clear_bit(XPRT_CONNECTED, &xprt->state);
> > > > xs_tcp_force_close(xprt);
> > > > }
> > > > out:
> > >
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > This isn't needed for 4.20 or newer because call_transmit() will
> > > now
> > > always call xprt_end_transmit(). I suggest that a stable fix do
> > > something similar (perhaps conditional on the error returned by
> > > xprt_transmit()?).
> > >
> >
> > Can you explain the handling in xs_tcp_state_change - why
> > XPRT_CONNECTED would need to remain set longer in the case of
> > handling
> > TCP_CLOSE case rather than TCP_CLOSE_WAIT? It seems like if we get
> > an
> > RST we'll go directly to TCP_CLOSE and why would the XPRT_CONNECTED
> > bit
> > getting cleared need to be delayed in that case?
> >
> > I will look into the approach you mention though at the moment I do
> > not
> > see how it helps because the underlying issue seems to be clearing
> > of
> > the XPRT_CONNECTED bit.
> >
>
> See xprt_clear_locked(). Dropping the XPRT_LOCK will automatically
> trigger autoclose if XPRT_CLOSE_WAIT is set, regardless of whether
> or
> not there are other tasks waiting for the lock.
>
>
Ok thanks for pointing me in that direction I will investigate.
I am actually seeing a hang now with the reproducer on 4.20-rc6 but
it's not CPU spinning. Investigating as it was not easy to reproduce
but there must still be a race somewhere.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-12 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 13:51 [PATCH 0/1] SUNRPC: Ensure XPRT_CONNECTED is cleared while handling TCP RST Dave Wysochanski
2018-12-12 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Dave Wysochanski
2018-12-12 16:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2018-12-12 17:47 ` Dave Wysochanski
2018-12-12 18:02 ` Trond Myklebust
2018-12-12 19:56 ` Dave Wysochanski [this message]
2019-01-08 12:46 ` Benjamin Coddington
2018-12-14 13:48 ` Dave Wysochanski
2018-12-14 18:29 ` Scott Mayhew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1544644581.3750.4.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).