From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/9] nfsd4: simplify process_lookup1
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:57:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1611269865-30153-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121204251.GB13298@pick.fieldses.org>
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
This STALE_CLIENTID check is redundant with the one in
lookup_clientid().
There's a difference in behavior is in case of memory allocation
failure, which I think isn't a big deal.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 1d2cd6a88f61..f9f89229dba6 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4680,8 +4680,6 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
struct nfs4_openowner *oo = NULL;
__be32 status;
- if (STALE_CLIENTID(&open->op_clientid, nn))
- return nfserr_stale_clientid;
/*
* In case we need it later, after we've already created the
* file and don't want to risk a further failure:
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-21 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 22:35 [PATCH 0/8] miscellaneous nfsd4 state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] nfsd4: simplify process_lookup1 J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] nfsd: simplify process_lock J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-20 21:01 ` Chuck Lever
2021-01-20 21:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] nfsd: simplify nfsd_renew J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] nfsd: refactor lookup_clientid J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-20 21:02 ` Chuck Lever
2021-01-20 23:01 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 1:54 ` Chuck Lever
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] nfsd4: simplify process_lookup1 J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] nfsd: simplify process_lock J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] nfsd: simplify nfsd_renew J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] nfsd: rename lookup_clientid->set_client J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] nfsd: refactor lookup_clientid J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] nfsd: find_cpntf_state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] nfsd: remove unused set_clientid argument J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 20:20 ` Chuck Lever
2021-01-21 20:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] nfsd: simplify process_lock J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] nfsd: simplify nfsd_renew J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] nfsd: rename lookup_clientid->set_client J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] nfsd: refactor set_client J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] nfsd: find_cpntf_state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] nfsd: remove unused set_client argument J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] nfsd: simplify nfsd4_check_open_reclaim J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 22:57 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] nfsd: cstate->session->se_client -> cstate->clp J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 23:34 ` Chuck Lever
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] nfsd: simplify nfsd4_check_open_reclaim J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-21 18:49 ` [PATCH 9/9] nfsd: cstate->session->se_client -> cstate->clp J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] nfsd: find_cpntf_state cleanup J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] nfsd: remove unused set_clientid argument J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] nfsd: simplify nfsd4_check_open_reclaim J. Bruce Fields
2021-01-19 22:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] nfsd: cstate->session->se_client -> cstate->clp J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1611269865-30153-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com \
--to=bfields@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).