From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from int-mailstore01.merit.edu ([207.75.116.232]:54208 "EHLO int-mailstore01.merit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754241Ab1FIWPa (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:15:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:15:28 -0400 From: Jim Rees To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: Benny Halevy , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, peter honeyman Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/88] pnfs block layout driver Message-ID: <20110609221528.GB28760@merit.edu> References: <4DF140AF.20208@panasas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4DF140AF.20208@panasas.com> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Boaz Harrosh wrote: Who is going to SQUASH all the SQUASHMEs and re think the all patch separation again. To something that makes a more logical progression and easier on the review. The way it is now I'm not able to review, sorry, I got lost trying to understand which is which. I'm open to suggestions and happy to do the work. I agree that 88 patches is nearly indigestable. However I note that Benny seems to have pulled in the entire set so I'm not sure how to proceed at this point. Also this code was in Benny's 2.6.38 and only got dropped when the 3.0 merge came along, so most of it's already been under review for a year or more.