From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] mount: improve signal management when locking mtab.
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:11:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110628121144.0afb228e@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E08B7D8.6050405@RedHat.com>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:03:20 -0400 Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/23/2011 12:09 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >
> > On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:08:25 -0600 Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Since we are going to adopt libmount for mount.nfs in the near future, would it be better to update libmount instead?
> >>
> >> How near?
> >>
> >> Libmount appears to get signal handling right already (though I haven't
> >> tested it). It blocks all signals rather than catching some of them.
> >>
> >> So switching to libmount would a perfectly reasonably response. However if
> >> that is more than a few weeks away I think I would rather see this fixed up
> >> anyway...
> >
> > We have a libmount-based mount.nfs already in the nfs-utils tree, IIRC. I don't think we yet have a generic plan for switching to installing that one by default. Steve?
> Well a while back I did add the libmount code along with --enable-libmount-mount
> configure flag. This flag has been enabled for a while now in the
> pre release of Fedora 16 so it will on in the release of f16.
>
> Plus I am looking to make a nfs-utils release... I'm in the process of
> clean things up just to do that. So I would be willing to enable the libmount
> code to be on by default. But I am concern not all distros do include
> the libmount code...
>
> Some clarity... If the libmount code is enabled, this patch is not needed?
>
No it is not ... however it would be nice if the affected code wasn't even
compiled in.
i.e. which a patch like this, it will not even compile the offending code if
libmount is selected.
NeilBrown
diff --git a/utils/mount/Makefile.am b/utils/mount/Makefile.am
index 056293c..7bc3e2b 100644
--- a/utils/mount/Makefile.am
+++ b/utils/mount/Makefile.am
@@ -9,11 +9,10 @@ man5_MANS = nfs.man
sbin_PROGRAMS = mount.nfs
EXTRA_DIST = nfsmount.x $(man8_MANS) $(man5_MANS)
-mount_common = error.c network.c fstab.c token.c \
+mount_common = error.c network.c token.c \
parse_opt.c parse_dev.c \
nfsmount.c nfs4mount.c stropts.c\
- nfsumount.c \
- mount_constants.h error.h network.h fstab.h token.h \
+ mount_constants.h error.h network.h token.h \
parse_opt.h parse_dev.h \
nfs4_mount.h nfs_mount4.h stropts.h version.h \
mount_config.h utils.c utils.h
@@ -33,7 +32,8 @@ if CONFIG_LIBMOUNT
mount_nfs_SOURCES += mount_libmount.c
mount_nfs_LDADD += $(LIBMOUNT)
else
-mount_nfs_SOURCES += mount.c
+mount_nfs_SOURCES += mount.c fstab.c nfsumount.c fstab.h
+
endif
MAINTAINERCLEANFILES = Makefile.in
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-28 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 6:38 [PATCH/RFC] mount: improve signal management when locking mtab NeilBrown
2011-06-22 15:08 ` Chuck Lever
2011-06-22 23:20 ` NeilBrown
2011-06-23 16:09 ` Chuck Lever
2011-06-27 17:03 ` Steve Dickson
2011-06-28 2:11 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2011-06-28 17:30 ` Steve Dickson
2011-06-29 14:27 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110628121144.0afb228e@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=SteveD@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).