From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:48539 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751287AbbBDH6A (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 02:58:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:57:56 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Layton , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/20] xfs: pass a 64-bit count argument to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten Message-ID: <20150204075756.GA763@lst.de> References: <1421925006-24231-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1421925006-24231-17-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150129205232.GB11064@fieldses.org> <20150202073024.GA9399@lst.de> <20150202192404.GI6282@dastard> <20150202194300.GN6282@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150202194300.GN6282@dastard> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:43:00AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > As to the pNFSD specific changes, I haven't really looked them over > in any great detail yet. My main concern is that there are no > specific regression tests for this yet, I'm not sure how we go about > verifying it actually works properly and we don't inadvertantly > break it in the future. Christoph? Any chance you could review them this week so we can get them merged in time for 3.20? In the worst case Bruce will have to pull the xfs tree into the nfsd tree so that we have all the dependencies available.