From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A55C43387 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 20:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638D82176F for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 20:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725831AbeLWUwx (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Dec 2018 15:52:53 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:53498 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725828AbeLWUwx (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Dec 2018 15:52:53 -0500 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id A3B31BD2; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 15:52:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 15:52:52 -0500 From: "bfields@fieldses.org" To: Vasily Averin Cc: Trond Myklebust , "anna.schumaker@netapp.com" , "khorenko@virtuozzo.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "eshatokhin@virtuozzo.com" , "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "jlayton@kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nfs: use-after-free in svc_process_common() Message-ID: <20181223205252.GA2613@fieldses.org> References: <134cf19c-e698-abed-02de-1659f9a5d4fb@virtuozzo.com> <20181217215026.GA8564@fieldses.org> <67f477b704d34b369f0530891a219f383f964001.camel@hammerspace.com> <4d878140-02c0-e306-fee6-1573d9fdecf2@virtuozzo.com> <068f1741afc54367853a2e4501fd95c2ab12a989.camel@hammerspace.com> <20181221010007.GA10196@fieldses.org> <9082b04a-8235-4b9d-39ae-1462fe350935@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9082b04a-8235-4b9d-39ae-1462fe350935@virtuozzo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 08:46:55PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote: > On 12/21/18 4:00 AM, bfields@fieldses.org wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 02:55:15PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> No. We don't care about xpt_flags for the back channel because there is > >> no "server transport". The actual transport is stored in the 'struct > >> rpc_rqst', and is the struct rpc_xprt corresponding to the client > >> socket or RDMA channel. > >> > >> IOW: All we really need in svc_process_common() is to be able to run > >> rqstp->rq_xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_prep_reply_hdr(), and that can be passed > >> either as a pointer to the struct svc_xprt_ops itself. > > > > For what it's worth, I'd rather get rid of that op--it's an awfully > > roundabout way just to do "svc_putnl(resv, 0);" in the tcp case. > > Do you mean that svc_create_xprt(serv, "tcp-bc", ...) was used ONLY to call > svc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr() in svc_process_common() ? > And according call for rdma-bc does nothing useful at all? Right, in the rdma case it's: void svc_rdma_prep_reply_hdr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp) { } > I've just tried to remove svc_create_xprt() from xs_tcp_bc_up() and > just provide pointer to svc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr() in > svc_process_common() via per-netns sunrpc_net -- and seems it was > enough, my testcase worked correctly. > > Am I missed something probably? Should we really remove > svc_create_xprt( "tcp/rdma-bc"...) related stuff? ? Haven't looked carefully, but off the top of my head I can't see why that wouldn't work. I also tried some patches that replace that op by a flag bit (doesn't address the original problem here, just seemed like a simplification): git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git but I don't if that's compatible with what you've done. --b.