From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E13CC5ACD5 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E866A20657 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 20:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729362AbfARUKw (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:10:52 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:51558 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729356AbfARUKw (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:10:52 -0500 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id E95771EF5; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:10:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:10:51 -0500 To: Chuck Lever Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linux NFS Mailing List , kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, simo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] SUNRPC: Add SPDX IDs to some net/sunrpc/auth_gss/ files Message-ID: <20190118201051.GA27125@fieldses.org> References: <20190117220233.13961.53423.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20190118072942.GA22125@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 10:42:00AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > On Jan 18, 2019, at 2:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > The general idea is to replace the existing boilerplate with just the tag, > > not add it on top. Altough someone will have to conform how that works > > with the BSD license. > > The online SPDX license text matches the license text in these particular > files. Can I therefore assume I have permission to remove the boilerplate > in this patch? I've got no special knowledge or insight, but: that sounds totally reasonable to me. --b.