From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DC6C169C4 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 20:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2662083B for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 20:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726565AbfBFUjP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:39:15 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:54340 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726022AbfBFUjP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:39:15 -0500 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id C82D01C8A; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:39:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:39:14 -0500 From: Bruce Fields To: Chuck Lever Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List , linux-rdma Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] svcrdma: Remove max_sge check at connect time Message-ID: <20190206203914.GD26258@fieldses.org> References: <154845326910.67269.13122816140536911275.stgit@seurat.1015granger.net> <20190126224419.GC24528@fieldses.org> <20E2C34D-C219-47AD-9688-69201E4162A8@oracle.com> <617D3968-4915-4121-8190-90B7752234DB@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <617D3968-4915-4121-8190-90B7752234DB@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 11:57:12AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2019, at 10:43 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> Thanks! Do you think this is suitable for 5.0 and stable, or should I > >> save it up for 5.1? > > > > Don would like to see it in 5.0 and stable. > > Hi Bruce, is this fix going to v5.0-rc ? Thanks for the reminder. For 5.0, I've got this and the copy error-return fix from Trond; I'll send a pull request tomorrow. --b.