From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Use poll() to fix up the socket requeue races
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:06:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190219140616.123141-1-trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> (raw)
Because we clear XPRT_SOCK_DATA_READY before reading, we can end up
with a situation where new data arrives, causing xs_data_ready() to
queue up a second receive worker job for the same socket, which then
immediately gets stuck waiting on the transport receive mutex.
The fix is to only clear XPRT_SOCK_DATA_READY once we're done reading,
and then to use poll() to check if we might need to queue up a new
job in order to deal with any new data.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
---
net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index f5d7dcd9e8d9..a721c843d5d3 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -656,13 +656,25 @@ xs_read_stream(struct sock_xprt *transport, int flags)
return ret != 0 ? ret : -ESHUTDOWN;
}
+static void xs_poll_check_readable(struct sock_xprt *transport)
+{
+ struct socket *sock = transport->sock;
+ __poll_t events;
+
+ clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_DATA_READY, &transport->sock_state);
+ events = sock->ops->poll(NULL, sock, NULL);
+ if (!(events & (EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM)) || events & EPOLLRDHUP)
+ return;
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(XPRT_SOCK_DATA_READY, &transport->sock_state))
+ queue_work(xprtiod_workqueue, &transport->recv_worker);
+}
+
static void xs_stream_data_receive(struct sock_xprt *transport)
{
size_t read = 0;
ssize_t ret = 0;
mutex_lock(&transport->recv_mutex);
- clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_DATA_READY, &transport->sock_state);
if (transport->sock == NULL)
goto out;
for (;;) {
@@ -672,6 +684,7 @@ static void xs_stream_data_receive(struct sock_xprt *transport)
read += ret;
cond_resched();
}
+ xs_poll_check_readable(transport);
out:
mutex_unlock(&transport->recv_mutex);
trace_xs_stream_read_data(&transport->xprt, ret, read);
@@ -1362,7 +1375,6 @@ static void xs_udp_data_receive(struct sock_xprt *transport)
int err;
mutex_lock(&transport->recv_mutex);
- clear_bit(XPRT_SOCK_DATA_READY, &transport->sock_state);
sk = transport->inet;
if (sk == NULL)
goto out;
@@ -1374,6 +1386,7 @@ static void xs_udp_data_receive(struct sock_xprt *transport)
consume_skb(skb);
cond_resched();
}
+ xs_poll_check_readable(transport);
out:
mutex_unlock(&transport->recv_mutex);
}
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 14:06 Trond Myklebust [this message]
2019-02-19 14:54 ` [PATCH] SUNRPC: Use poll() to fix up the socket requeue races Chuck Lever
2019-02-19 15:13 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-02-19 15:20 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190219140616.123141-1-trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).