From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=HPA/=RI=vger.kernel.org=linux-nfs-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE867C43381
	for <linux-nfs@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  5 Mar 2019 21:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A60A20652
	for <linux-nfs@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  5 Mar 2019 21:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726296AbfCEVrs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:47:48 -0500
Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:40572 "EHLO fieldses.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726902AbfCEVrs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:47:48 -0500
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815)
        id 14A6949A; Tue,  5 Mar 2019 16:47:48 -0500 (EST)
Date:   Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:47:48 -0500
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc:     Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Volker.Lendecke@sernet.de, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
        samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Better interop for NFS/SMB file share mode/reservation
Message-ID: <20190305214748.GD27437@fieldses.org>
References: <CAOQ4uxjQdLrZXkpP30Pq_=Cckcb=mADrEwQUXmsG92r-gn2y5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <379106947f859bdf5db4c6f9c4ab8c44f7423c08.camel@kernel.org>
 <CAOQ4uxgewN=j3ju5MSowEvwhK1HqKG3n1hBRUQTi1W5asaO1dQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190208155052.GB20573@fieldses.org>
 <CAOQ4uxg9NGPRpMZt0KgH9HUKMRpn0dFta7EnP1WioRb917n4+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190208221239.GA199180@jra3>
 <CAOQ4uxjxQoCWqfp+f91--tyR81PREsssT=RV9uRgCQFs+yk7mw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20190214210652.GC9216@fieldses.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190214210652.GC9216@fieldses.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 04:06:52PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> After this:
> 
> 	https://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=154966239918297&w=2
> 
> delegations would no longer conflict with opens from the same tgid.  So
> if your threads all run in the same process and you're willing to manage
> conflicts among your own clients, that should still allow you to do
> multiple opens of the same file without giving up your lease/delegation.
> 
> I'd be curious to know whether that works with Samba's design.

Any idea whether that would work?

(Easy?  Impossible?  Possible, but realistically the changes required to
Samba would be painful enough that it'd be unlikely to get done?)

--b.