From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937CCC04E84 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B702084F for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 18:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726707AbfEOSah (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 14:30:37 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:32782 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726467AbfEOSah (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 May 2019 14:30:37 -0400 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 490711E3A; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:30:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 14:30:37 -0400 From: "J. Bruce Fields" To: Olga Kornievskaia Cc: linux-nfs Subject: Re: discuss NFS xfstest failures Message-ID: <20190515183037.GB11614@fieldses.org> References: <20190416193548.GA6662@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190416193548.GA6662@fieldses.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:35:48PM -0400, bfields wrote: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:01:39PM -0400, Olga Kornievskaia wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > We have some output at the wiki -- > > https://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Xfstests -- capturing a data > > point of failures (for 4.16 kernel). However, I see many more failures > > with the current (5.1-rc1). Wiki output should probably be updated > > since xfstest has now 500+ tests. I have done my best to go over the > > failures and provide some summary and comments. I'd like to see if the > > community has any comments. Anybody else would like to share their > > outputs from the xfstests that show other failures? > > For what it's worth, I keep a list in testd/data/xfstests-failed with > some minimal comments: > > git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/testd.git > > Current contents appended. As you can see there's a lot that's known > unsupported features, but also a lot that I just haven't looked into > yet. Also, I added pointers to my list and Ben's on that wiki page at: http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Xfstests#Other_sources --b.