linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john.hubbard@gmail.com
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/34] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock()
Date: Sun,  4 Aug 2019 15:48:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190804224915.28669-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190804224915.28669-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com>

From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>

Provide a more capable variation of put_user_pages_dirty_lock(),
and delete put_user_pages_dirty(). This is based on the
following:

1. Lots of call sites become simpler if a bool is passed
into put_user_page*(), instead of making the call site
choose which put_user_page*() variant to call.

2. Christoph Hellwig's observation that set_page_dirty_lock()
is usually correct, and set_page_dirty() is usually a
bug, or at least questionable, within a put_user_page*()
calling chain.

This leads to the following API choices:

    * put_user_pages_dirty_lock(page, npages, make_dirty)

    * There is no put_user_pages_dirty(). You have to
      hand code that, in the rare case that it's
      required.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c             |   5 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c    |   5 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c |  13 +--
 drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c   |   5 +-
 drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c        |  19 +---
 include/linux/mm.h                         |   5 +-
 mm/gup.c                                   | 115 +++++++++------------
 7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
index 08da840ed7ee..965cf9dea71a 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c
@@ -54,10 +54,7 @@ static void __ib_umem_release(struct ib_device *dev, struct ib_umem *umem, int d
 
 	for_each_sg_page(umem->sg_head.sgl, &sg_iter, umem->sg_nents, 0) {
 		page = sg_page_iter_page(&sg_iter);
-		if (umem->writable && dirty)
-			put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1);
-		else
-			put_user_page(page);
+		put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, umem->writable && dirty);
 	}
 
 	sg_free_table(&umem->sg_head);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c
index b89a9b9aef7a..469acb961fbd 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c
@@ -118,10 +118,7 @@ int hfi1_acquire_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, size_t np
 void hfi1_release_user_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct page **p,
 			     size_t npages, bool dirty)
 {
-	if (dirty)
-		put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages);
-	else
-		put_user_pages(p, npages);
+	put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, npages, dirty);
 
 	if (mm) { /* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */
 		atomic64_sub(npages, &mm->pinned_vm);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c
index bfbfbb7e0ff4..26c1fb8d45cc 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c
@@ -37,15 +37,6 @@
 
 #include "qib.h"
 
-static void __qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages,
-				     int dirty)
-{
-	if (dirty)
-		put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages);
-	else
-		put_user_pages(p, num_pages);
-}
-
 /**
  * qib_map_page - a safety wrapper around pci_map_page()
  *
@@ -124,7 +115,7 @@ int qib_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages,
 
 	return 0;
 bail_release:
-	__qib_release_user_pages(p, got, 0);
+	put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, got, false);
 bail:
 	atomic64_sub(num_pages, &current->mm->pinned_vm);
 	return ret;
@@ -132,7 +123,7 @@ int qib_get_user_pages(unsigned long start_page, size_t num_pages,
 
 void qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages)
 {
-	__qib_release_user_pages(p, num_pages, 1);
+	put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages, true);
 
 	/* during close after signal, mm can be NULL */
 	if (current->mm)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
index 0b0237d41613..62e6ffa9ad78 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
@@ -75,10 +75,7 @@ static void usnic_uiom_put_pages(struct list_head *chunk_list, int dirty)
 		for_each_sg(chunk->page_list, sg, chunk->nents, i) {
 			page = sg_page(sg);
 			pa = sg_phys(sg);
-			if (dirty)
-				put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1);
-			else
-				put_user_page(page);
+			put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, dirty);
 			usnic_dbg("pa: %pa\n", &pa);
 		}
 		kfree(chunk);
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
index 67171c82b0c4..1e197753bf2f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c
@@ -60,20 +60,6 @@ struct siw_mem *siw_mem_id2obj(struct siw_device *sdev, int stag_index)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static void siw_free_plist(struct siw_page_chunk *chunk, int num_pages,
-			   bool dirty)
-{
-	struct page **p = chunk->plist;
-
-	while (num_pages--) {
-		if (!PageDirty(*p) && dirty)
-			put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, 1);
-		else
-			put_user_page(*p);
-		p++;
-	}
-}
-
 void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty)
 {
 	struct mm_struct *mm_s = umem->owning_mm;
@@ -82,8 +68,9 @@ void siw_umem_release(struct siw_umem *umem, bool dirty)
 	for (i = 0; num_pages; i++) {
 		int to_free = min_t(int, PAGES_PER_CHUNK, num_pages);
 
-		siw_free_plist(&umem->page_chunk[i], to_free,
-			       umem->writable && dirty);
+		put_user_pages_dirty_lock(umem->page_chunk[i].plist,
+					  to_free,
+					  umem->writable && dirty);
 		kfree(umem->page_chunk[i].plist);
 		num_pages -= to_free;
 	}
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 0334ca97c584..9759b6a24420 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1057,8 +1057,9 @@ static inline void put_user_page(struct page *page)
 	put_page(page);
 }
 
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
+void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+			       bool make_dirty);
+
 void put_user_pages(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages);
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM) && !defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index 98f13ab37bac..7fefd7ab02c4 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -29,85 +29,70 @@ struct follow_page_context {
 	unsigned int page_mask;
 };
 
-typedef int (*set_dirty_func_t)(struct page *page);
-
-static void __put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages,
-				   unsigned long npages,
-				   set_dirty_func_t sdf)
-{
-	unsigned long index;
-
-	for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
-		struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
-
-		/*
-		 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key cases:
-		 *
-		 * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it skips
-		 * the call to sdf(). That could happen because
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io() called page_mkclean(),
-		 * followed by set_page_dirty(). However, now the page is
-		 * going to get written back, which meets the original
-		 * intention of setting it dirty, so all is well:
-		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes on to call
-		 * TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page back.
-		 *
-		 * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls sdf().
-		 * The page stays dirty, despite being written back, so it
-		 * gets written back again in the next writeback cycle.
-		 * This is harmless.
-		 */
-		if (!PageDirty(page))
-			sdf(page);
-
-		put_user_page(page);
-	}
-}
-
 /**
- * put_user_pages_dirty() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
- * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
+ * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and optionally dirty gup-pinned pages
+ * @pages:  array of pages to be maybe marked dirty, and definitely released.
  * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
+ * @make_dirty: whether to mark the pages dirty
  *
  * "gup-pinned page" refers to a page that has had one of the get_user_pages()
  * variants called on that page.
  *
  * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
+ * compound page) dirty, if @make_dirty is true, and if the page was previously
+ * listed as clean. In any case, releases all pages using put_user_page(),
+ * possibly via put_user_pages(), for the non-dirty case.
  *
  * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
  *
- * set_page_dirty(), which does not lock the page, is used here.
- * Therefore, it is the caller's responsibility to ensure that this is
- * safe. If not, then put_user_pages_dirty_lock() should be called instead.
+ * set_page_dirty_lock() is used internally. If instead, set_page_dirty() is
+ * required, then the caller should a) verify that this is really correct,
+ * because _lock() is usually required, and b) hand code it:
+ * set_page_dirty_lock(), put_user_page().
  *
  */
-void put_user_pages_dirty(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
+void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages,
+			       bool make_dirty)
 {
-	__put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty);
+	unsigned long index;
 
-/**
- * put_user_pages_dirty_lock() - release and dirty an array of gup-pinned pages
- * @pages:  array of pages to be marked dirty and released.
- * @npages: number of pages in the @pages array.
- *
- * For each page in the @pages array, make that page (or its head page, if a
- * compound page) dirty, if it was previously listed as clean. Then, release
- * the page using put_user_page().
- *
- * Please see the put_user_page() documentation for details.
- *
- * This is just like put_user_pages_dirty(), except that it invokes
- * set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty().
- *
- */
-void put_user_pages_dirty_lock(struct page **pages, unsigned long npages)
-{
-	__put_user_pages_dirty(pages, npages, set_page_dirty_lock);
+	/*
+	 * TODO: this can be optimized for huge pages: if a series of pages is
+	 * physically contiguous and part of the same compound page, then a
+	 * single operation to the head page should suffice.
+	 */
+
+	if (!make_dirty) {
+		put_user_pages(pages, npages);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	for (index = 0; index < npages; index++) {
+		struct page *page = compound_head(pages[index]);
+		/*
+		 * Checking PageDirty at this point may race with
+		 * clear_page_dirty_for_io(), but that's OK. Two key
+		 * cases:
+		 *
+		 * 1) This code sees the page as already dirty, so it
+		 * skips the call to set_page_dirty(). That could happen
+		 * because clear_page_dirty_for_io() called
+		 * page_mkclean(), followed by set_page_dirty().
+		 * However, now the page is going to get written back,
+		 * which meets the original intention of setting it
+		 * dirty, so all is well: clear_page_dirty_for_io() goes
+		 * on to call TestClearPageDirty(), and write the page
+		 * back.
+		 *
+		 * 2) This code sees the page as clean, so it calls
+		 * set_page_dirty(). The page stays dirty, despite being
+		 * written back, so it gets written back again in the
+		 * next writeback cycle. This is harmless.
+		 */
+		if (!PageDirty(page))
+			set_page_dirty_lock(page);
+		put_user_page(page);
+	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(put_user_pages_dirty_lock);
 
-- 
2.22.0


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-04 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-04 22:48 [PATCH v2 00/34] put_user_pages(): miscellaneous call sites john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` john.hubbard [this message]
2019-08-06 17:39   ` [PATCH v2 01/34] mm/gup: add make_dirty arg to put_user_pages_dirty_lock() Ira Weiny
2019-08-06 20:39     ` John Hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 02/34] net/rds: convert put_page() to put_user_page*() john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 03/34] net/ceph: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 04/34] x86/kvm: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 05/34] drm/etnaviv: convert release_pages() to put_user_pages() john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 06/34] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*() john.hubbard
2019-08-05 16:53   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 07/34] drm/radeon: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 08/34] media/ivtv: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 09/34] media/v4l2-core/mm: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 10/34] genwqe: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 11/34] scif: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 12/34] vmci: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 13/34] rapidio: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 14/34] oradax: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 15/34] staging/vc04_services: " john.hubbard
2019-08-13  5:23   ` Stefan Wahren
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 16/34] drivers/tee: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 17/34] vfio: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:48 ` [PATCH v2 18/34] fbdev/pvr2fb: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 19/34] fsl_hypervisor: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 20/34] xen: " john.hubbard
2019-08-05  4:15   ` Juergen Gross
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 21/34] fs/exec.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 22/34] orangefs: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 23/34] uprobes: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 24/34] futex: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 25/34] mm/frame_vector.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 26/34] mm/gup_benchmark.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 27/34] mm/memory.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 28/34] mm/madvise.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 29/34] mm/process_vm_access.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 30/34] crypt: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 31/34] fs/nfs: " john.hubbard
2019-08-05  0:26   ` Calum Mackay
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 32/34] goldfish_pipe: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 33/34] kernel/events/core.c: " john.hubbard
2019-08-04 22:49 ` [PATCH v2 34/34] fs/binfmt_elf: " john.hubbard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190804224915.28669-2-jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --to=john.hubbard@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=devel@lists.orangefs.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).