linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	"anna.schumaker@netapp.com" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] NFS: handle NFSv4.1 server that doesn't support NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:15:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107161536.GA944@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lfr7fu9v.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 04:19:56PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> I was a bit surprised that nfs4_map_atomic_open_claim() exists at all,
> but given that it did, I assumed it would be used more uniformly.
> 
> So this all implies that Linux NFS server claimed to support NFSv4.1
> before it actually did - which seems odd.  This is just a bug (which are
> expected), but a clear ommission.

For what it's worth, I did make some attempt to keep 4.1 by default
until 3.11 (see d109148111cd "nfsd4: support minorversion 1 by default")
but probably could have communicated that better.  This isn't the only
blatant known issue in older code.

--b.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-07 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-18 22:47 [PATCH/RFC] NFS: handle NFSv4.1 server that doesn't support NFS4_OPEN_CLAIM_DELEG_CUR_FH NeilBrown
2019-12-18 23:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-12-19  2:56   ` NeilBrown
2019-12-19  5:12     ` Trond Myklebust
2019-12-19  5:39       ` NeilBrown
2019-12-19 13:24         ` Trond Myklebust
2019-12-20  5:19           ` NeilBrown
2020-01-07 16:15             ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2020-01-07 16:53               ` J. Bruce Fields
2020-01-07 23:16               ` NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200107161536.GA944@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).