From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1BBC433E0 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04A820B1F for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fieldses.org header.i=@fieldses.org header.b="CCihwot2" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726095AbgGTOM6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:12:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53750 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725934AbgGTOM6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:12:58 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B357C061794 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 714038768; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:12:55 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org 714038768 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1595254375; bh=tOp2GC5dEnoPiXY4E7v82/PQH5kc63mmSarJkbNcd5Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CCihwot2g7u4xdSoa8Kr2NddsKGWtGCyXKu/epoNjgeV7kPEFrt/P/LqqjTJC1Bkp 2somJGmCB5IlE2BI/BecqFXghfLWR75xYKkexwJGcqZ0xVqtpsix0QmlAwIaCc15m/ KzaWWFkQOQYNL4SJFSC6rkVUTr73Ti1pmYP3U6ic= Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:12:55 -0400 From: "bfields@fieldses.org" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "ltp@lists.linux.it" , "pvorel@suse.cz" , "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "alexey.kodanev@oracle.com" , "yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] Remove nfsv4 Message-ID: <20200720141255.GA25707@fieldses.org> References: <20200720091449.19813-1-pvorel@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:32:09PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:14 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > Reasons to drop: > > * outdated tests (from 2005) > > * not used (NFS kernel maintainers use pynfs [1]) > > * written in Python (we support C and shell, see [2]) > > > > [1] http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/pynfs.git;a=summary > > [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/547 > > > > Unlike pynfs, these tests run on a real NFS client, and were designed > to test client implementations, as well as the servers. > > So if they get dropped from ltp, then we will have to figure out some > other way of continuing to maintain them. Just for fun, I grepped through old mail to see if I could find any cases of these tests being used. I found one, in which Chuck reports an nfslock01 failure. Looks like it did find a real bug, which we fixed: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8DF85CB6-5FEB-4A25-9715-C9808F37A4B1@oracle.com https://lore.kernel.org/r/20160807185024.11705.10864.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net --b.