From: trondmy@kernel.org
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] pNFS: We want return-on-close to complete when evicting the inode
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 00:31:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210107053130.20341-2-trondmy@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107053130.20341-1-trondmy@kernel.org>
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
If the inode is being evicted, it should be safe to run return-on-close,
so we should do it to ensure we don't inadvertently leak layout segments.
Fixes: 1c5bd76d17cc ("pNFS: Enable layoutreturn operation for return-on-close")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 8 +++-----
fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 8 +++-----
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 14acd2f79107..2f4679a62712 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3536,10 +3536,8 @@ static void nfs4_close_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
trace_nfs4_close(state, &calldata->arg, &calldata->res, task->tk_status);
/* Handle Layoutreturn errors */
- if (pnfs_roc_done(task, calldata->inode,
- &calldata->arg.lr_args,
- &calldata->res.lr_res,
- &calldata->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
+ if (pnfs_roc_done(task, &calldata->arg.lr_args, &calldata->res.lr_res,
+ &calldata->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
goto out_restart;
/* hmm. we are done with the inode, and in the process of freeing
@@ -6384,10 +6382,8 @@ static void nfs4_delegreturn_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *calldata)
trace_nfs4_delegreturn_exit(&data->args, &data->res, task->tk_status);
/* Handle Layoutreturn errors */
- if (pnfs_roc_done(task, data->inode,
- &data->args.lr_args,
- &data->res.lr_res,
- &data->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
+ if (pnfs_roc_done(task, &data->args.lr_args, &data->res.lr_res,
+ &data->res.lr_ret) == -EAGAIN)
goto out_restart;
switch (task->tk_status) {
@@ -6441,10 +6437,10 @@ static void nfs4_delegreturn_release(void *calldata)
struct nfs4_delegreturndata *data = calldata;
struct inode *inode = data->inode;
+ if (data->lr.roc)
+ pnfs_roc_release(&data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
+ data->res.lr_ret);
if (inode) {
- if (data->lr.roc)
- pnfs_roc_release(&data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
- data->res.lr_ret);
nfs_post_op_update_inode_force_wcc(inode, &data->fattr);
nfs_iput_and_deactive(inode);
}
@@ -6520,16 +6516,14 @@ static int _nfs4_proc_delegreturn(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred,
nfs_fattr_init(data->res.fattr);
data->timestamp = jiffies;
data->rpc_status = 0;
- data->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(inode, &data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res, cred);
data->inode = nfs_igrab_and_active(inode);
- if (data->inode) {
+ if (data->inode || issync) {
+ data->lr.roc = pnfs_roc(inode, &data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res,
+ cred);
if (data->lr.roc) {
data->args.lr_args = &data->lr.arg;
data->res.lr_res = &data->lr.res;
}
- } else if (data->lr.roc) {
- pnfs_roc_release(&data->lr.arg, &data->lr.res, 0);
- data->lr.roc = false;
}
task_setup_data.callback_data = data;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
index e8d08ec6fa86..30802d45c99a 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1509,10 +1509,8 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
return false;
}
-int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp,
- int *ret)
+int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp, int *ret)
{
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *arg = *argpp;
int retval = -EAGAIN;
@@ -1545,7 +1543,7 @@ int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
return 0;
case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
if (!nfs4_layout_refresh_old_stateid(&arg->stateid,
- &arg->range, inode))
+ &arg->range, arg->inode))
break;
*ret = -NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT;
return -EAGAIN;
diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
index bbd3de1025f2..d810ae674f4e 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
@@ -297,10 +297,8 @@ bool pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
const struct cred *cred);
-int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
- struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp,
- int *ret);
+int pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
+ struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp, int *ret);
void pnfs_roc_release(struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args *args,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res *res,
int ret);
@@ -772,7 +770,7 @@ pnfs_roc(struct inode *ino,
}
static inline int
-pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task, struct inode *inode,
+pnfs_roc_done(struct rpc_task *task,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_args **argpp,
struct nfs4_layoutreturn_res **respp,
int *ret)
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-07 5:31 [PATCH v2 1/7] pNFS: Mark layout for return if return-on-close was not sent trondmy
2021-01-07 5:31 ` trondmy [this message]
2021-01-07 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] pNFS: Clean up pnfs_layoutreturn_free_lsegs() trondmy
2021-01-07 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] pNFS: Stricter ordering of layoutget and layoutreturn trondmy
2021-01-07 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] NFS/pNFS: Don't call pnfs_free_bucket_lseg() before removing the request trondmy
2021-01-07 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] NFS/pNFS: Don't leak DS commits in pnfs_generic_retry_commit() trondmy
2021-01-07 5:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] NFS/pNFS: Fix a leak of the layout 'plh_outstanding' counter trondmy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210107053130.20341-2-trondmy@kernel.org \
--to=trondmy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).