[RFC PATCH v2 02/48] iov_iter: Remove last_offset member

[RFC PATCH v2 02/48] iov_iter: Remove last_offset member

[David Howells]

With the removal of ITER_PIPE, the last_offset member of struct iov_iter is
no longer used, so remove it and un-unionise the remaining member.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 include/linux/uio.h | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/uio.h b/include/linux/uio.h
index 74598426edb4..2d8a70cb9b26 100644
--- a/include/linux/uio.h
+++ b/include/linux/uio.h
@@ -43,10 +43,7 @@ struct iov_iter {
 	bool nofault;
 	bool data_source;
 	bool user_backed;
-	union {
-		size_t iov_offset;
-		int last_offset;
-	};
+	size_t iov_offset;
 	size_t count;
 	union {
 		const struct iovec *iov;

[RFC PATCH v2 03/48] iov_iter: Add an iterator-of-iterators

[David Howells]

Add a new I/O iterator type, ITER_ITERLIST, that allows iteration over a
series of I/O iterators, provided the iterators are all the same direction
(all ITER_SOURCE or all ITER_DEST) and none of them are themselves
ITER_ITERLIST (this function is recursive).

To make reversion possible, I've added an 'orig_count' member into the
iov_iter struct so that reversion of an ITER_ITERLIST can know when to go
move backwards through the iter list.  It might make more sense to make the
iterator list element, say:

	struct itervec {
		struct iov_iter iter;
		size_t orig_count;
	};

rather than expanding struct iov_iter itself and have iov_iter_iterlist()
set vec[i].orig_count from vec[i].iter->count.

Also, for the moment, I've only permitted its use with source iterators
(eg. sendmsg).

To use this, you allocate an array of iterators and point the list iterator
at it, e.g.:

	struct iov_iter iters[3];
	struct msghdr msg;

	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[0], ITER_SOURCE, &head_bv, 1,
		      sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
	iov_iter_xarray(&iters[1], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->pages,
			xdr->page_fpos, xdr->page_len);
	iov_iter_kvec(&iters[2], ITER_SOURCE, &tail_kv, 1,
		      tail->iov_len);
	iov_iter_iterlist(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iters, 3, size);

This can be used by network filesystem protocols, such as sunrpc, to glue a
header and a trailer on to some data to form a message and then dump the
entire message onto the socket in a single go.

[!] Note: I'm not entirely sure that this is a good idea: the problem is
    that it's reasonably common practice to copy an iterator by direct
    assignment - and that works for the existing iterators... but not this
    one.  With the iterator-of-iterators, the list of iterators has to be
    modified if we recurse.  It's probably fine just for calling sendmsg()
    from network filesystems, but I'm not 100% sure of that.

Suggested-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 include/linux/uio.h |  13 ++-
 lib/iov_iter.c      | 254 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 260 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/uio.h b/include/linux/uio.h
index 2d8a70cb9b26..6c75c94566b8 100644
--- a/include/linux/uio.h
+++ b/include/linux/uio.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ enum iter_type {
 	ITER_XARRAY,
 	ITER_DISCARD,
 	ITER_UBUF,
+	ITER_ITERLIST,
 };
 
 #define ITER_SOURCE	1	// == WRITE
@@ -45,12 +46,14 @@ struct iov_iter {
 	bool user_backed;
 	size_t iov_offset;
 	size_t count;
+	size_t orig_count;
 	union {
 		const struct iovec *iov;
 		const struct kvec *kvec;
 		const struct bio_vec *bvec;
 		struct xarray *xarray;
 		void __user *ubuf;
+		struct iov_iter *iterlist;
 	};
 	union {
 		unsigned long nr_segs;
@@ -101,6 +104,11 @@ static inline bool iov_iter_is_xarray(const struct iov_iter *i)
 	return iov_iter_type(i) == ITER_XARRAY;
 }
 
+static inline bool iov_iter_is_iterlist(const struct iov_iter *i)
+{
+	return iov_iter_type(i) == ITER_ITERLIST;
+}
+
 static inline unsigned char iov_iter_rw(const struct iov_iter *i)
 {
 	return i->data_source ? WRITE : READ;
@@ -235,6 +243,8 @@ void iov_iter_bvec(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, const struct bio_
 void iov_iter_discard(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, size_t count);
 void iov_iter_xarray(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, struct xarray *xarray,
 		     loff_t start, size_t count);
+void iov_iter_iterlist(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, struct iov_iter *iterlist,
+		       unsigned long nr_segs, size_t count);
 ssize_t iov_iter_get_pages(struct iov_iter *i, struct page **pages,
 		size_t maxsize, unsigned maxpages, size_t *start,
 		iov_iter_extraction_t extraction_flags);
@@ -342,7 +352,8 @@ static inline void iov_iter_ubuf(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction,
 		.user_backed = true,
 		.data_source = direction,
 		.ubuf = buf,
-		.count = count
+		.count = count,
+		.orig_count = count,
 	};
 }
 /* Flags for iov_iter_get/extract_pages*() */
diff --git a/lib/iov_iter.c b/lib/iov_iter.c
index fad95e4cf372..8a9ae4af45fc 100644
--- a/lib/iov_iter.c
+++ b/lib/iov_iter.c
@@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ void iov_iter_init(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction,
 		.iov = iov,
 		.nr_segs = nr_segs,
 		.iov_offset = 0,
-		.count = count
+		.count = count,
+		.orig_count = count,
 	};
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_init);
@@ -364,6 +365,26 @@ size_t _copy_from_iter(void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!i->data_source))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))) {
+		size_t copied = 0;
+
+		while (bytes && i->count) {
+			size_t part = min(bytes, i->iterlist->count), n;
+
+			if (part > 0)
+				n = _copy_from_iter(addr, part, i->iterlist);
+			addr += n;
+			copied += n;
+			bytes -= n;
+			i->count -= n;
+			if (n < part || !bytes)
+				break;
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
+		return copied;
+	}
+
 	if (user_backed_iter(i))
 		might_fault();
 	iterate_and_advance(i, bytes, base, len, off,
@@ -380,6 +401,27 @@ size_t _copy_from_iter_nocache(void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!i->data_source))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))) {
+		size_t copied = 0;
+
+		while (bytes && i->count) {
+			size_t part = min(bytes, i->iterlist->count), n;
+
+			if (part > 0)
+				n = _copy_from_iter_nocache(addr, part,
+							    i->iterlist);
+			addr += n;
+			copied += n;
+			bytes -= n;
+			i->count -= n;
+			if (n < part || !bytes)
+				break;
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
+		return copied;
+	}
+
 	iterate_and_advance(i, bytes, base, len, off,
 		__copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(addr + off, base, len),
 		memcpy(addr + off, base, len)
@@ -411,6 +453,27 @@ size_t _copy_from_iter_flushcache(void *addr, size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!i->data_source))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))) {
+		size_t copied = 0;
+
+		while (bytes && i->count) {
+			size_t part = min(bytes, i->iterlist->count), n;
+
+			if (part > 0)
+				n = _copy_from_iter_flushcache(addr, part,
+							       i->iterlist);
+			addr += n;
+			copied += n;
+			bytes -= n;
+			i->count -= n;
+			if (n < part || !bytes)
+				break;
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
+		return copied;
+	}
+
 	iterate_and_advance(i, bytes, base, len, off,
 		__copy_from_user_flushcache(addr + off, base, len),
 		memcpy_flushcache(addr + off, base, len)
@@ -514,7 +577,31 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_zero);
 size_t copy_page_from_iter_atomic(struct page *page, unsigned offset, size_t bytes,
 				  struct iov_iter *i)
 {
-	char *kaddr = kmap_atomic(page), *p = kaddr + offset;
+	char *kaddr, *p;
+
+	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))) {
+		size_t copied = 0;
+
+		while (bytes && i->count) {
+			size_t part = min(bytes, i->iterlist->count), n;
+
+			if (part > 0)
+				n = copy_page_from_iter_atomic(page, offset, part,
+							       i->iterlist);
+			offset += n;
+			copied += n;
+			bytes -= n;
+			i->count -= n;
+			if (n < part || !bytes)
+				break;
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
+		return copied;
+	}
+
+	kaddr = kmap_atomic(page);
+	p = kaddr + offset;
 	if (!page_copy_sane(page, offset, bytes)) {
 		kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
 		return 0;
@@ -585,19 +672,49 @@ void iov_iter_advance(struct iov_iter *i, size_t size)
 		iov_iter_bvec_advance(i, size);
 	} else if (iov_iter_is_discard(i)) {
 		i->count -= size;
+	}else if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i)) {
+		i->count -= size;
+		for (;;) {
+			size_t part = min(size, i->iterlist->count);
+
+			if (part > 0)
+				iov_iter_advance(i->iterlist, part);
+			size -= part;
+			if (!size)
+				break;
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_advance);
 
+static void iov_iter_revert_iterlist(struct iov_iter *i, size_t unroll)
+{
+	for (;;) {
+		size_t part = min(unroll, i->iterlist->orig_count - i->iterlist->count);
+
+		if (part > 0)
+			iov_iter_revert(i->iterlist, part);
+		unroll -= part;
+		if (!unroll)
+			break;
+		i->iterlist--;
+		i->nr_segs++;
+	}
+}
+
 void iov_iter_revert(struct iov_iter *i, size_t unroll)
 {
 	if (!unroll)
 		return;
-	if (WARN_ON(unroll > MAX_RW_COUNT))
+	if (WARN_ON(unroll > i->orig_count - i->count))
 		return;
 	i->count += unroll;
 	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_discard(i)))
 		return;
+	if (unlikely(iov_iter_is_iterlist(i)))
+		return iov_iter_revert_iterlist(i, unroll);
 	if (unroll <= i->iov_offset) {
 		i->iov_offset -= unroll;
 		return;
@@ -641,6 +758,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_revert);
  */
 size_t iov_iter_single_seg_count(const struct iov_iter *i)
 {
+	if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))
+		i = i->iterlist;
 	if (i->nr_segs > 1) {
 		if (likely(iter_is_iovec(i) || iov_iter_is_kvec(i)))
 			return min(i->count, i->iov->iov_len - i->iov_offset);
@@ -662,7 +781,8 @@ void iov_iter_kvec(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction,
 		.kvec = kvec,
 		.nr_segs = nr_segs,
 		.iov_offset = 0,
-		.count = count
+		.count = count,
+		.orig_count = count,
 	};
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_kvec);
@@ -678,7 +798,8 @@ void iov_iter_bvec(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction,
 		.bvec = bvec,
 		.nr_segs = nr_segs,
 		.iov_offset = 0,
-		.count = count
+		.count = count,
+		.orig_count = count,
 	};
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_bvec);
@@ -706,6 +827,7 @@ void iov_iter_xarray(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction,
 		.xarray = xarray,
 		.xarray_start = start,
 		.count = count,
+		.orig_count = count,
 		.iov_offset = 0
 	};
 }
@@ -727,11 +849,47 @@ void iov_iter_discard(struct iov_iter *i, unsigned int direction, size_t count)
 		.iter_type = ITER_DISCARD,
 		.data_source = false,
 		.count = count,
+		.orig_count = count,
 		.iov_offset = 0
 	};
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_discard);
 
+/**
+ * iov_iter_iterlist - Initialise an I/O iterator that is a list of iterators
+ * @iter: The iterator to initialise.
+ * @direction: The direction of the transfer.
+ * @iterlist: The list of iterators
+ * @nr_segs: The number of elements in the list
+ * @count: The size of the I/O buffer in bytes.
+ *
+ * Set up an I/O iterator that just discards everything that's written to it.
+ * It's only available as a source iterator (for WRITE), all the iterators in
+ * the list must be the same and none of them can be ITER_ITERLIST type.
+ */
+void iov_iter_iterlist(struct iov_iter *iter, unsigned int direction,
+		       struct iov_iter *iterlist, unsigned long nr_segs,
+		       size_t count)
+{
+	unsigned long i;
+
+	BUG_ON(direction != WRITE);
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_segs; i++) {
+		BUG_ON(iterlist[i].iter_type == ITER_ITERLIST);
+		BUG_ON(!iterlist[i].data_source);
+	}
+
+	*iter = (struct iov_iter){
+		.iter_type	= ITER_ITERLIST,
+		.data_source	= true,
+		.count		= count,
+		.orig_count	= count,
+		.iterlist	= iterlist,
+		.nr_segs	= nr_segs,
+	};
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_iterlist);
+
 static bool iov_iter_aligned_iovec(const struct iov_iter *i, unsigned addr_mask,
 				   unsigned len_mask)
 {
@@ -879,6 +1037,15 @@ unsigned long iov_iter_alignment(const struct iov_iter *i)
 	if (iov_iter_is_xarray(i))
 		return (i->xarray_start + i->iov_offset) | i->count;
 
+	if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i)) {
+		unsigned long align = 0;
+		unsigned int j;
+
+		for (j = 0; j < i->nr_segs; j++)
+			align |= iov_iter_alignment(&i->iterlist[j]);
+		return align;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_alignment);
@@ -1078,6 +1245,18 @@ static ssize_t __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(struct iov_iter *i,
 	}
 	if (iov_iter_is_xarray(i))
 		return iter_xarray_get_pages(i, pages, maxsize, maxpages, start);
+	if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i)) {
+		ssize_t size;
+
+		while (!i->iterlist->count) {
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
+		size = __iov_iter_get_pages_alloc(i->iterlist, pages, maxsize, maxpages,
+						  start, extraction_flags);
+		i->count -= size;
+		return size;
+	}
 	return -EFAULT;
 }
 
@@ -1126,6 +1305,31 @@ ssize_t iov_iter_get_pages_alloc2(struct iov_iter *i,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_get_pages_alloc2);
 
+static size_t csum_and_copy_from_iterlist(void *addr, size_t bytes, __wsum *csum,
+					  struct iov_iter *i)
+{
+	size_t copied = 0, n;
+
+	while (i->count && i->nr_segs) {
+		struct iov_iter *j = i->iterlist;
+
+		if (j->count == 0) {
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		n = csum_and_copy_from_iter(addr, bytes - copied, csum, j);
+		addr += n;
+		copied += n;
+		i->count -= n;
+		if (n == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return copied;
+}
+
 size_t csum_and_copy_from_iter(void *addr, size_t bytes, __wsum *csum,
 			       struct iov_iter *i)
 {
@@ -1133,6 +1337,8 @@ size_t csum_and_copy_from_iter(void *addr, size_t bytes, __wsum *csum,
 	sum = *csum;
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!i->data_source))
 		return 0;
+	if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))
+		return csum_and_copy_from_iterlist(addr, bytes, csum, i);
 
 	iterate_and_advance(i, bytes, base, len, off, ({
 		next = csum_and_copy_from_user(base, addr + off, len);
@@ -1236,6 +1442,21 @@ static int bvec_npages(const struct iov_iter *i, int maxpages)
 	return npages;
 }
 
+static int iterlist_npages(const struct iov_iter *i, int maxpages)
+{
+	ssize_t size = i->count;
+	const struct iov_iter *p;
+	int npages = 0;
+
+	for (p = i->iterlist; size; p++) {
+		size -= p->count;
+		npages += iov_iter_npages(p, maxpages - npages);
+		if (unlikely(npages >= maxpages))
+			return maxpages;
+	}
+	return npages;
+}
+
 int iov_iter_npages(const struct iov_iter *i, int maxpages)
 {
 	if (unlikely(!i->count))
@@ -1255,6 +1476,8 @@ int iov_iter_npages(const struct iov_iter *i, int maxpages)
 		int npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(offset + i->count, PAGE_SIZE);
 		return min(npages, maxpages);
 	}
+	if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i))
+		return iterlist_npages(i, maxpages);
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(iov_iter_npages);
@@ -1266,11 +1489,14 @@ const void *dup_iter(struct iov_iter *new, struct iov_iter *old, gfp_t flags)
 		return new->bvec = kmemdup(new->bvec,
 				    new->nr_segs * sizeof(struct bio_vec),
 				    flags);
-	else if (iov_iter_is_kvec(new) || iter_is_iovec(new))
+	if (iov_iter_is_kvec(new) || iter_is_iovec(new))
 		/* iovec and kvec have identical layout */
 		return new->iov = kmemdup(new->iov,
 				   new->nr_segs * sizeof(struct iovec),
 				   flags);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iov_iter_is_iterlist(old)))
+		/* Don't allow dup'ing of iterlist as the cleanup is complicated */
+		return NULL;
 	return NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(dup_iter);
@@ -1759,6 +1985,22 @@ ssize_t iov_iter_extract_pages(struct iov_iter *i,
 		return iov_iter_extract_xarray_pages(i, pages, maxsize,
 						     maxpages, extraction_flags,
 						     offset0);
+	if (iov_iter_is_iterlist(i)) {
+		ssize_t size;
+
+		while (i->nr_segs && !i->iterlist->count) {
+			i->iterlist++;
+			i->nr_segs--;
+		}
+		if (!i->nr_segs) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(i->count);
+			return 0;
+		}
+		size = iov_iter_extract_pages(i->iterlist, pages, maxsize, maxpages,
+					      extraction_flags, offset0);
+		i->count -= size;
+		return size;
+	}
 	return -EFAULT;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iov_iter_extract_pages);

[RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

When transmitting data, call down into TCP using a single sendmsg with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather than
performing several sendmsg and sendpage calls to transmit header, data
pages and trailer.

To make this work, the data is assembled in a bio_vec array and attached to
a BVEC-type iterator.  The header and trailer are copied into page
fragments so that they can be freed with put_page and attached to iterators
of their own.  An iterator-of-iterators is then created to bridge all three
iterators (headers, data, trailer) and that is passed to sendmsg to pass
the entire message in a single call.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 11 +++--
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       | 89 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
index 877891536c2f..456ae554aa11 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
@@ -161,16 +161,15 @@ static inline bool svc_put_not_last(struct svc_serv *serv)
 extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
 
 /*
- * RPC Requsts and replies are stored in one or more pages.
+ * RPC Requests and replies are stored in one or more pages.
  * We maintain an array of pages for each server thread.
  * Requests are copied into these pages as they arrive.  Remaining
  * pages are available to write the reply into.
  *
- * Pages are sent using ->sendpage so each server thread needs to
- * allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
- * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live,
- * and a send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part
- * of a reply.
+ * Pages are sent using ->sendmsg with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES so each server thread
+ * needs to allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
+ * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live, and a
+ * send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part of a reply.
  *
  * We use xdr_buf for holding responses as it fits well with NFS
  * read responses (that have a header, and some data pages, and possibly
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 03a4f5615086..f1cc53aad6e0 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1060,16 +1060,8 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	return 0;	/* record not complete */
 }
 
-static int svc_tcp_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, const struct kvec *vec,
-			      int flags)
-{
-	return kernel_sendpage(sock, virt_to_page(vec->iov_base),
-			       offset_in_page(vec->iov_base),
-			       vec->iov_len, flags);
-}
-
 /*
- * kernel_sendpage() is used exclusively to reduce the number of
+ * MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
  * copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
  * that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
  *
@@ -1081,65 +1073,54 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
 {
 	const struct kvec *head = xdr->head;
 	const struct kvec *tail = xdr->tail;
-	struct kvec rm = {
-		.iov_base	= &marker,
-		.iov_len	= sizeof(marker),
-	};
+	struct iov_iter iters[3];
+	struct bio_vec head_bv, tail_bv;
 	struct msghdr msg = {
-		.msg_flags	= 0,
+		.msg_flags	= MSG_SPLICE_PAGES,
 	};
-	int ret;
+	void *m, *t;
+	int ret, n = 2, size;
 
 	*sentp = 0;
 	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &rm, 1, rm.iov_len);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-	*sentp += ret;
-	if (ret != rm.iov_len)
-		return -EAGAIN;
+	m = page_frag_alloc(NULL, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len + tail->iov_len,
+			    GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!m)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, head, 0);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-	*sentp += ret;
-	if (ret != head->iov_len)
-		goto out;
+	memcpy(m, &marker, sizeof(marker));
+	if (head->iov_len)
+		memcpy(m + sizeof(marker), head->iov_base, head->iov_len);
+	bvec_set_virt(&head_bv, m, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
+	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[0], ITER_SOURCE, &head_bv, 1,
+		      sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
 
-	if (xdr->page_len) {
-		unsigned int offset, len, remaining;
-		struct bio_vec *bvec;
-
-		bvec = xdr->bvec + (xdr->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-		offset = offset_in_page(xdr->page_base);
-		remaining = xdr->page_len;
-		while (remaining > 0) {
-			len = min(remaining, bvec->bv_len - offset);
-			ret = kernel_sendpage(sock, bvec->bv_page,
-					      bvec->bv_offset + offset,
-					      len, 0);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
-			*sentp += ret;
-			if (ret != len)
-				goto out;
-			remaining -= len;
-			offset = 0;
-			bvec++;
-		}
-	}
+	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[1], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
+		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
 
 	if (tail->iov_len) {
-		ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, tail, 0);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			return ret;
-		*sentp += ret;
+		t = page_frag_alloc(NULL, tail->iov_len, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!t)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		memcpy(t, tail->iov_base, tail->iov_len);
+		bvec_set_virt(&tail_bv,  t, tail->iov_len);
+		iov_iter_bvec(&iters[2], ITER_SOURCE, &tail_bv, 1, tail->iov_len);
+		n++;
 	}
 
-out:
+	size = sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len + xdr->page_len + tail->iov_len;
+	iov_iter_iterlist(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iters, n, size);
+
+	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+	if (ret > 0)
+		*sentp = ret;
+	if (ret != size)
+		return -EAGAIN;
 	return 0;
 }
 

[RFC PATCH v2 41/48] sunrpc: Rely on TCP sendmsg + MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to copy unspliceable data

[David Howells]

Rather than copying data in svc_tcp_sendmsg() into page fragments, just
hand in ITER_KVEC iterators as part of the ITER_ITERLIST and rely on TCP to
copy them if the pages they're residing on are belong to the slab or have a
zero refcount.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 44 ++++++++++++--------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index f1cc53aad6e0..c1421f6fe57a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1071,47 +1071,27 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
 			   rpc_fraghdr marker, unsigned int *sentp)
 {
-	const struct kvec *head = xdr->head;
-	const struct kvec *tail = xdr->tail;
-	struct iov_iter iters[3];
-	struct bio_vec head_bv, tail_bv;
-	struct msghdr msg = {
-		.msg_flags	= MSG_SPLICE_PAGES,
-	};
-	void *m, *t;
-	int ret, n = 2, size;
+	struct iov_iter iters[4];
+	struct kvec marker_kv;
+	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, };
+	int ret, n = 0, size;
 
 	*sentp = 0;
 	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	m = page_frag_alloc(NULL, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len + tail->iov_len,
-			    GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!m)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	memcpy(m, &marker, sizeof(marker));
-	if (head->iov_len)
-		memcpy(m + sizeof(marker), head->iov_base, head->iov_len);
-	bvec_set_virt(&head_bv, m, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
-	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[0], ITER_SOURCE, &head_bv, 1,
-		      sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
-
-	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[1], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
+	marker_kv.iov_base = &marker;
+	marker_kv.iov_len  = sizeof(marker);
+	iov_iter_kvec(&iters[n++], ITER_SOURCE, &marker_kv, 1, sizeof(marker));
+	iov_iter_kvec(&iters[n++], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->head, 1, xdr->head->iov_len);
+	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[n++], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
 		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
 
-	if (tail->iov_len) {
-		t = page_frag_alloc(NULL, tail->iov_len, GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!t)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		memcpy(t, tail->iov_base, tail->iov_len);
-		bvec_set_virt(&tail_bv,  t, tail->iov_len);
-		iov_iter_bvec(&iters[2], ITER_SOURCE, &tail_bv, 1, tail->iov_len);
-		n++;
-	}
+	if (xdr->tail->iov_len)
+		iov_iter_kvec(&iters[n++], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->tail, 1, xdr->tail->iov_len);
 
-	size = sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len + xdr->page_len + tail->iov_len;
+	size = sizeof(marker) + xdr->head->iov_len + xdr->page_len + xdr->tail->iov_len;
 	iov_iter_iterlist(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iters, n, size);
 
 	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[Chuck Lever III]

> On Mar 29, 2023, at 10:13 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> When transmitting data, call down into TCP using a single sendmsg with
> MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather than
> performing several sendmsg and sendpage calls to transmit header, data
> pages and trailer.
> 
> To make this work, the data is assembled in a bio_vec array and attached to
> a BVEC-type iterator.  The header and trailer are copied into page
> fragments so that they can be freed with put_page and attached to iterators
> of their own.  An iterator-of-iterators is then created to bridge all three
> iterators (headers, data, trailer) and that is passed to sendmsg to pass
> the entire message in a single call.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
> cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h | 11 +++--
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       | 89 +++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> index 877891536c2f..456ae554aa11 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> @@ -161,16 +161,15 @@ static inline bool svc_put_not_last(struct svc_serv *serv)
> extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
> 
> /*
> - * RPC Requsts and replies are stored in one or more pages.
> + * RPC Requests and replies are stored in one or more pages.
>  * We maintain an array of pages for each server thread.
>  * Requests are copied into these pages as they arrive.  Remaining
>  * pages are available to write the reply into.
>  *
> - * Pages are sent using ->sendpage so each server thread needs to
> - * allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
> - * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live,
> - * and a send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part
> - * of a reply.
> + * Pages are sent using ->sendmsg with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES so each server thread
> + * needs to allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
> + * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live, and a
> + * send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part of a reply.
>  *
>  * We use xdr_buf for holding responses as it fits well with NFS
>  * read responses (that have a header, and some data pages, and possibly
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 03a4f5615086..f1cc53aad6e0 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -1060,16 +1060,8 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> 	return 0;	/* record not complete */
> }
> 
> -static int svc_tcp_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, const struct kvec *vec,
> -			      int flags)
> -{
> -	return kernel_sendpage(sock, virt_to_page(vec->iov_base),
> -			       offset_in_page(vec->iov_base),
> -			       vec->iov_len, flags);
> -}
> -
> /*
> - * kernel_sendpage() is used exclusively to reduce the number of
> + * MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
>  * copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
>  * that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
>  *
> @@ -1081,65 +1073,54 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
> {
> 	const struct kvec *head = xdr->head;
> 	const struct kvec *tail = xdr->tail;
> -	struct kvec rm = {
> -		.iov_base	= &marker,
> -		.iov_len	= sizeof(marker),
> -	};
> +	struct iov_iter iters[3];
> +	struct bio_vec head_bv, tail_bv;
> 	struct msghdr msg = {
> -		.msg_flags	= 0,
> +		.msg_flags	= MSG_SPLICE_PAGES,
> 	};
> -	int ret;
> +	void *m, *t;
> +	int ret, n = 2, size;
> 
> 	*sentp = 0;
> 	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
> 	if (ret < 0)
> 		return ret;
> 
> -	ret = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &rm, 1, rm.iov_len);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -	*sentp += ret;
> -	if (ret != rm.iov_len)
> -		return -EAGAIN;
> +	m = page_frag_alloc(NULL, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len + tail->iov_len,
> +			    GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!m)
> +		return -ENOMEM;

I'm not excited about adding another memory allocation for this
very common case.

It seems to me that you could eliminate the kernel_sendpage()
consumer here in svc_tcp_sendmsg() without also replacing the
kernel_sendmsg() calls. That would be a conservative step-wise
approach which would carry less risk, and would accomplish
your stated goal without more radical surgery.

Later maybe we can find a way to deal with the head, tail, and
record marker without additional memory allocations. I believe
on the server side, head and tail are already in pages, for
example, not in kmalloc'd memory. That would need some code
auditing, but I'm OK with combining these into a single
sock_sendmsg() call once we've worked out the disposition of
the xdr_buf components outside of the bvec. That seems a bit
outside your stated goal.

Simply replacing the kernel_sendpage() loop would be a
straightforward change and easy to evaluate and test, and
I'd welcome that without hesitation.


> -	ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, head, 0);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -	*sentp += ret;
> -	if (ret != head->iov_len)
> -		goto out;
> +	memcpy(m, &marker, sizeof(marker));
> +	if (head->iov_len)
> +		memcpy(m + sizeof(marker), head->iov_base, head->iov_len);
> +	bvec_set_virt(&head_bv, m, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
> +	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[0], ITER_SOURCE, &head_bv, 1,
> +		      sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
> 
> -	if (xdr->page_len) {
> -		unsigned int offset, len, remaining;
> -		struct bio_vec *bvec;
> -
> -		bvec = xdr->bvec + (xdr->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -		offset = offset_in_page(xdr->page_base);
> -		remaining = xdr->page_len;
> -		while (remaining > 0) {
> -			len = min(remaining, bvec->bv_len - offset);
> -			ret = kernel_sendpage(sock, bvec->bv_page,
> -					      bvec->bv_offset + offset,
> -					      len, 0);
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				return ret;
> -			*sentp += ret;
> -			if (ret != len)
> -				goto out;
> -			remaining -= len;
> -			offset = 0;
> -			bvec++;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	iov_iter_bvec(&iters[1], ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
> +		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
> 
> 	if (tail->iov_len) {
> -		ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, tail, 0);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> -			return ret;
> -		*sentp += ret;
> +		t = page_frag_alloc(NULL, tail->iov_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!t)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		memcpy(t, tail->iov_base, tail->iov_len);
> +		bvec_set_virt(&tail_bv,  t, tail->iov_len);
> +		iov_iter_bvec(&iters[2], ITER_SOURCE, &tail_bv, 1, tail->iov_len);
> +		n++;
> 	}
> 
> -out:
> +	size = sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len + xdr->page_len + tail->iov_len;

	size = sizeof(marker) + xdr->len;

If xdr->len != head->iov_len + xdr->page_len + tail->iov_len,
that is a bug these days.


> +	iov_iter_iterlist(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, iters, n, size);
> +
> +	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (ret > 0)
> +		*sentp = ret;
> +	if (ret != size)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 

--
Chuck Lever

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

Hi Chuck,

Do you have a simple AF_TLS test to hand?

David

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> It seems to me that you could eliminate the kernel_sendpage()
> consumer here in svc_tcp_sendmsg() without also replacing the
> kernel_sendmsg() calls. That would be a conservative step-wise
> approach which would carry less risk, and would accomplish
> your stated goal without more radical surgery.

Note that only the marker is sent with kernel_sendmsg() in the unmodified
code; the head and tail are sent with svc_tcp_send_kvec()... which uses
kernel_sendpage() which needs to be changed in my patchset.  I can make it do
individual sendmsg calls for all those for now.

David

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> > +	if (ret > 0)
> > +		*sentp = ret;

Should that be:

		*sentp = ret - sizeof(marker);

David

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> Simply replacing the kernel_sendpage() loop would be a
> straightforward change and easy to evaluate and test, and
> I'd welcome that without hesitation.

How about the attached for a first phase?

It does three sendmsgs, one for the marker + header, one for the body and one
for the tail.

David
---
sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

When transmitting data, call down into TCP using sendmsg with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather than
performing sendpage calls to transmit header, data pages and trailer.

The marker and the header are passed in an array of kvecs.  The marker will
get copied and the header will get spliced.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |   11 +++---
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       |   75 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
index 877891536c2f..456ae554aa11 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
@@ -161,16 +161,15 @@ static inline bool svc_put_not_last(struct svc_serv *serv)
 extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
 
 /*
- * RPC Requsts and replies are stored in one or more pages.
+ * RPC Requests and replies are stored in one or more pages.
  * We maintain an array of pages for each server thread.
  * Requests are copied into these pages as they arrive.  Remaining
  * pages are available to write the reply into.
  *
- * Pages are sent using ->sendpage so each server thread needs to
- * allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
- * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live,
- * and a send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part
- * of a reply.
+ * Pages are sent using ->sendmsg with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES so each server thread
+ * needs to allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
+ * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live, and a
+ * send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part of a reply.
  *
  * We use xdr_buf for holding responses as it fits well with NFS
  * read responses (that have a header, and some data pages, and possibly
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 03a4f5615086..14efcc08c6f8 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1060,16 +1060,8 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	return 0;	/* record not complete */
 }
 
-static int svc_tcp_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, const struct kvec *vec,
-			      int flags)
-{
-	return kernel_sendpage(sock, virt_to_page(vec->iov_base),
-			       offset_in_page(vec->iov_base),
-			       vec->iov_len, flags);
-}
-
 /*
- * kernel_sendpage() is used exclusively to reduce the number of
+ * MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
  * copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
  * that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
  *
@@ -1081,13 +1073,9 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
 {
 	const struct kvec *head = xdr->head;
 	const struct kvec *tail = xdr->tail;
-	struct kvec rm = {
-		.iov_base	= &marker,
-		.iov_len	= sizeof(marker),
-	};
-	struct msghdr msg = {
-		.msg_flags	= 0,
-	};
+	struct kvec kv[2];
+	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_MORE, };
+	size_t sent;
 	int ret;
 
 	*sentp = 0;
@@ -1095,51 +1083,36 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &rm, 1, rm.iov_len);
+	kv[0].iov_base = &marker;
+	kv[0].iov_len = sizeof(marker);
+	kv[1] = *head;
+	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, kv, 2, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
+	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	*sentp += ret;
-	if (ret != rm.iov_len)
-		return -EAGAIN;
+	sent = ret;
 
-	ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, head, 0);
+	if (!tail->iov_len)
+		msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
+	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
+		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
+	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	*sentp += ret;
-	if (ret != head->iov_len)
-		goto out;
-
-	if (xdr->page_len) {
-		unsigned int offset, len, remaining;
-		struct bio_vec *bvec;
-
-		bvec = xdr->bvec + (xdr->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-		offset = offset_in_page(xdr->page_base);
-		remaining = xdr->page_len;
-		while (remaining > 0) {
-			len = min(remaining, bvec->bv_len - offset);
-			ret = kernel_sendpage(sock, bvec->bv_page,
-					      bvec->bv_offset + offset,
-					      len, 0);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
-			*sentp += ret;
-			if (ret != len)
-				goto out;
-			remaining -= len;
-			offset = 0;
-			bvec++;
-		}
-	}
+	sent += ret;
 
 	if (tail->iov_len) {
-		ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, tail, 0);
+		msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
+		iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, tail, 1, tail->iov_len);
+		ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
-		*sentp += ret;
+		sent += ret;
 	}
-
-out:
+	if (sent > 0)
+		*sentp = sent;
+	if (sent != sizeof(marker) + xdr->len)
+		return -EAGAIN;
 	return 0;
 }
 

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[Chuck Lever III]

> On Mar 30, 2023, at 5:41 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>>> +	if (ret > 0)
>>> +		*sentp = ret;
> 
> Should that be:
> 
> 		*sentp = ret - sizeof(marker);
> 
> David
> 

That's a bit out of context, but ...

The return value of ->xpo_sendto is effectively ignored. There is
no caller of svc_process that checks its return code.

svc_rdma_sendto(), for example, returns zero or a negative errno.

That should be cleaned up one day.

--
Chuck Lever

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> > Simply replacing the kernel_sendpage() loop would be a
> > straightforward change and easy to evaluate and test, and
> > I'd welcome that without hesitation.
> 
> How about the attached for a first phase?
> 
> It does three sendmsgs, one for the marker + header, one for the body and one
> for the tail.

... And this as a second phase.

David
---
sunrpc: Allow xdr->bvec[] to be extended to do a single sendmsg

Allow xdr->bvec[] to be extended and insert the marker, the header and the
tail into it so that a single sendmsg() can be used to transmit the message.

I wonder if it would be possible to insert the marker at the beginning of the
head buffer.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h |    2 -
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       |   46 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 net/sunrpc/xdr.c           |   19 ++++++++++--------
 net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c      |    6 ++---
 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
index 72014c9216fc..c74ea483228b 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void	xdr_inline_pages(struct xdr_buf *, unsigned int,
 			 struct page **, unsigned int, unsigned int);
 void	xdr_terminate_string(const struct xdr_buf *, const u32);
 size_t	xdr_buf_pagecount(const struct xdr_buf *buf);
-int	xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp);
+int	xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int head, unsigned int tail);
 void	xdr_free_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf);
 
 static inline __be32 *xdr_encode_array(__be32 *p, const void *s, unsigned int len)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 14efcc08c6f8..e55761fe1ccf 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	if (svc_xprt_is_dead(xprt))
 		goto out_notconn;
 
-	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
+	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL, 0, 0);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
@@ -1073,45 +1073,29 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
 {
 	const struct kvec *head = xdr->head;
 	const struct kvec *tail = xdr->tail;
-	struct kvec kv[2];
-	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_MORE, };
-	size_t sent;
+	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, };
+	size_t n;
 	int ret;
 
 	*sentp = 0;
-	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
+	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL, 2, 1);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-	kv[0].iov_base = &marker;
-	kv[0].iov_len = sizeof(marker);
-	kv[1] = *head;
-	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, kv, 2, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
+	n = 2 + xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr);
+	bvec_set_virt(&xdr->bvec[0], &marker, sizeof(marker));
+	bvec_set_virt(&xdr->bvec[1], head->iov_base, head->iov_len);
+	bvec_set_virt(&xdr->bvec[n], tail->iov_base, tail->iov_len);
+	if (tail->iov_len)
+		n++;
+	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec, n,
+		      sizeof(marker) + xdr->len);
 	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
-	sent = ret;
-
-	if (!tail->iov_len)
-		msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
-	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
-		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
-	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
-	sent += ret;
-
-	if (tail->iov_len) {
-		msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
-		iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, tail, 1, tail->iov_len);
-		ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
-		if (ret < 0)
-			return ret;
-		sent += ret;
-	}
-	if (sent > 0)
-		*sentp = sent;
-	if (sent != sizeof(marker) + xdr->len)
+	if (ret > 0)
+		*sentp = ret;
+	if (ret != sizeof(marker) + xdr->len)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
index 36835b2f5446..695821963849 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
@@ -141,18 +141,21 @@ size_t xdr_buf_pagecount(const struct xdr_buf *buf)
 }
 
 int
-xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp)
+xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int head, unsigned int tail)
 {
-	size_t i, n = xdr_buf_pagecount(buf);
+	size_t i, j = 0, n = xdr_buf_pagecount(buf);
 
-	if (n != 0 && buf->bvec == NULL) {
-		buf->bvec = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(buf->bvec[0]), gfp);
+	if (head + n + tail != 0 && buf->bvec == NULL) {
+		buf->bvec = kmalloc_array(head + n + tail,
+					  sizeof(buf->bvec[0]), gfp);
 		if (!buf->bvec)
 			return -ENOMEM;
-		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
-			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[i], buf->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE,
-				      0);
-		}
+		for (i = 0; i < head; i++)
+			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[j++], NULL, 0, 0);
+		for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[j++], buf->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+		for (i = 0; i < tail; i++)
+			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[j++], NULL, 0, 0);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index adcbedc244d6..fdf67e84b1c7 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int xs_stream_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req, bool vm_wait)
 
 static int xs_stream_prepare_request(struct rpc_rqst *req, struct xdr_buf *buf)
 {
-	return xdr_alloc_bvec(buf, rpc_task_gfp_mask());
+	return xdr_alloc_bvec(buf, rpc_task_gfp_mask(), 0, 0);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int xs_udp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 	if (!xprt_request_get_cong(xprt, req))
 		return -EBADSLT;
 
-	status = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask());
+	status = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask(), 0, 0);
 	if (status < 0)
 		return status;
 	req->rq_xtime = ktime_get();
@@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ static int bc_sendto(struct rpc_rqst *req)
 	int err;
 
 	req->rq_xtime = ktime_get();
-	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask());
+	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask(), 0, 0);
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 	err = xprt_sock_sendmsg(transport->sock, &msg, xdr, 0, marker, &sent);

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[Chuck Lever III]

> On Mar 30, 2023, at 9:16 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Simply replacing the kernel_sendpage() loop would be a
>>> straightforward change and easy to evaluate and test, and
>>> I'd welcome that without hesitation.
>> 
>> How about the attached for a first phase?
>> 
>> It does three sendmsgs, one for the marker + header, one for the body and one
>> for the tail.
> 
> ... And this as a second phase.
> 
> David
> ---
> sunrpc: Allow xdr->bvec[] to be extended to do a single sendmsg
> 
> Allow xdr->bvec[] to be extended and insert the marker, the header and the
> tail into it so that a single sendmsg() can be used to transmit the message.

Don't. Just change svc_tcp_send_kvec() to use sock_sendmsg, and
leave the marker alone for now, please.

Let's focus on replacing kernel_sendpage() in this series and
leave the deeper clean-ups for another time.


> I wonder if it would be possible to insert the marker at the beginning of the
> head buffer.

That's the way it used to work. The reason we don't do that is
because each transport has its own record marking mechanism.

UDP has nothing, since each RPC message is encapsulated in a
single datagram. RDMA has a full XDR-encoded header which
contains the location of data chunks to be moved via RDMA.


> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
> cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h |    2 -
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       |   46 ++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> net/sunrpc/xdr.c           |   19 ++++++++++--------
> net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c      |    6 ++---
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> index 72014c9216fc..c74ea483228b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xdr.h
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void	xdr_inline_pages(struct xdr_buf *, unsigned int,
> 			 struct page **, unsigned int, unsigned int);
> void	xdr_terminate_string(const struct xdr_buf *, const u32);
> size_t	xdr_buf_pagecount(const struct xdr_buf *buf);
> -int	xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp);
> +int	xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int head, unsigned int tail);
> void	xdr_free_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf);
> 
> static inline __be32 *xdr_encode_array(__be32 *p, const void *s, unsigned int len)
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 14efcc08c6f8..e55761fe1ccf 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int svc_udp_sendto(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> 	if (svc_xprt_is_dead(xprt))
> 		goto out_notconn;
> 
> -	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL, 0, 0);
> 	if (err < 0)
> 		goto out_unlock;
> 
> @@ -1073,45 +1073,29 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
> {
> 	const struct kvec *head = xdr->head;
> 	const struct kvec *tail = xdr->tail;
> -	struct kvec kv[2];
> -	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_MORE, };
> -	size_t sent;
> +	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES, };
> +	size_t n;
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	*sentp = 0;
> -	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	ret = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, GFP_KERNEL, 2, 1);
> 	if (ret < 0)
> 		return ret;
> 
> -	kv[0].iov_base = &marker;
> -	kv[0].iov_len = sizeof(marker);
> -	kv[1] = *head;
> -	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, kv, 2, sizeof(marker) + head->iov_len);
> +	n = 2 + xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr);
> +	bvec_set_virt(&xdr->bvec[0], &marker, sizeof(marker));
> +	bvec_set_virt(&xdr->bvec[1], head->iov_base, head->iov_len);
> +	bvec_set_virt(&xdr->bvec[n], tail->iov_base, tail->iov_len);
> +	if (tail->iov_len)
> +		n++;
> +	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec, n,
> +		      sizeof(marker) + xdr->len);
> 	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> 	if (ret < 0)
> 		return ret;
> -	sent = ret;
> -
> -	if (!tail->iov_len)
> -		msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
> -	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
> -		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
> -	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		return ret;
> -	sent += ret;
> -
> -	if (tail->iov_len) {
> -		msg.msg_flags &= ~MSG_MORE;
> -		iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, tail, 1, tail->iov_len);
> -		ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> -			return ret;
> -		sent += ret;
> -	}
> -	if (sent > 0)
> -		*sentp = sent;
> -	if (sent != sizeof(marker) + xdr->len)
> +	if (ret > 0)
> +		*sentp = ret;
> +	if (ret != sizeof(marker) + xdr->len)
> 		return -EAGAIN;
> 	return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
> index 36835b2f5446..695821963849 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xdr.c
> @@ -141,18 +141,21 @@ size_t xdr_buf_pagecount(const struct xdr_buf *buf)
> }
> 
> int
> -xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp)
> +xdr_alloc_bvec(struct xdr_buf *buf, gfp_t gfp, unsigned int head, unsigned int tail)
> {
> -	size_t i, n = xdr_buf_pagecount(buf);
> +	size_t i, j = 0, n = xdr_buf_pagecount(buf);
> 
> -	if (n != 0 && buf->bvec == NULL) {
> -		buf->bvec = kmalloc_array(n, sizeof(buf->bvec[0]), gfp);
> +	if (head + n + tail != 0 && buf->bvec == NULL) {
> +		buf->bvec = kmalloc_array(head + n + tail,
> +					  sizeof(buf->bvec[0]), gfp);
> 		if (!buf->bvec)
> 			return -ENOMEM;
> -		for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> -			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[i], buf->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE,
> -				      0);
> -		}
> +		for (i = 0; i < head; i++)
> +			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[j++], NULL, 0, 0);
> +		for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> +			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[j++], buf->pages[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> +		for (i = 0; i < tail; i++)
> +			bvec_set_page(&buf->bvec[j++], NULL, 0, 0);
> 	}
> 	return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> index adcbedc244d6..fdf67e84b1c7 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
> @@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int xs_stream_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req, bool vm_wait)
> 
> static int xs_stream_prepare_request(struct rpc_rqst *req, struct xdr_buf *buf)
> {
> -	return xdr_alloc_bvec(buf, rpc_task_gfp_mask());
> +	return xdr_alloc_bvec(buf, rpc_task_gfp_mask(), 0, 0);
> }
> 
> /*
> @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int xs_udp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req)
> 	if (!xprt_request_get_cong(xprt, req))
> 		return -EBADSLT;
> 
> -	status = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask());
> +	status = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask(), 0, 0);
> 	if (status < 0)
> 		return status;
> 	req->rq_xtime = ktime_get();
> @@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ static int bc_sendto(struct rpc_rqst *req)
> 	int err;
> 
> 	req->rq_xtime = ktime_get();
> -	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask());
> +	err = xdr_alloc_bvec(xdr, rpc_task_gfp_mask(), 0, 0);
> 	if (err < 0)
> 		return err;
> 	err = xprt_sock_sendmsg(transport->sock, &msg, xdr, 0, marker, &sent);
> 

--
Chuck Lever

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[David Howells]

Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:

> Don't. Just change svc_tcp_send_kvec() to use sock_sendmsg, and
> leave the marker alone for now, please.

If you insist.  See attached.

David
---
sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

When transmitting data, call down into TCP using sendmsg with
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather than
performing sendpage calls to transmit header, data pages and trailer.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |   11 +++++------
 net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       |   40 +++++++++++++---------------------------
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
index 877891536c2f..456ae554aa11 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
@@ -161,16 +161,15 @@ static inline bool svc_put_not_last(struct svc_serv *serv)
 extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
 
 /*
- * RPC Requsts and replies are stored in one or more pages.
+ * RPC Requests and replies are stored in one or more pages.
  * We maintain an array of pages for each server thread.
  * Requests are copied into these pages as they arrive.  Remaining
  * pages are available to write the reply into.
  *
- * Pages are sent using ->sendpage so each server thread needs to
- * allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
- * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live,
- * and a send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part
- * of a reply.
+ * Pages are sent using ->sendmsg with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES so each server thread
+ * needs to allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
+ * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live, and a
+ * send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part of a reply.
  *
  * We use xdr_buf for holding responses as it fits well with NFS
  * read responses (that have a header, and some data pages, and possibly
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 03a4f5615086..af146e053dfc 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@ -1059,17 +1059,18 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
 	svc_xprt_received(rqstp->rq_xprt);
 	return 0;	/* record not complete */
 }
-
+ 
 static int svc_tcp_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, const struct kvec *vec,
 			      int flags)
 {
-	return kernel_sendpage(sock, virt_to_page(vec->iov_base),
-			       offset_in_page(vec->iov_base),
-			       vec->iov_len, flags);
+	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | flags, };
+
+	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, vec, 1, vec->iov_len);
+	return sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
 }
 
 /*
- * kernel_sendpage() is used exclusively to reduce the number of
+ * MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
  * copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
  * that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
  *
@@ -1109,28 +1110,13 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
 	if (ret != head->iov_len)
 		goto out;
 
-	if (xdr->page_len) {
-		unsigned int offset, len, remaining;
-		struct bio_vec *bvec;
-
-		bvec = xdr->bvec + (xdr->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-		offset = offset_in_page(xdr->page_base);
-		remaining = xdr->page_len;
-		while (remaining > 0) {
-			len = min(remaining, bvec->bv_len - offset);
-			ret = kernel_sendpage(sock, bvec->bv_page,
-					      bvec->bv_offset + offset,
-					      len, 0);
-			if (ret < 0)
-				return ret;
-			*sentp += ret;
-			if (ret != len)
-				goto out;
-			remaining -= len;
-			offset = 0;
-			bvec++;
-		}
-	}
+	msg.msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
+	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
+		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
+	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+	*sentp += ret;
 
 	if (tail->iov_len) {
 		ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, tail, 0);

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[Chuck Lever III]

> On Mar 30, 2023, at 10:26 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Don't. Just change svc_tcp_send_kvec() to use sock_sendmsg, and
>> leave the marker alone for now, please.
> 
> If you insist.  See attached.

Very good, thank you for accommodating my regression paranoia.

Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>


> 
> David
> ---
> sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage
> 
> When transmitting data, call down into TCP using sendmsg with
> MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather than
> performing sendpage calls to transmit header, data pages and trailer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
> cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |   11 +++++------
> net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       |   40 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> index 877891536c2f..456ae554aa11 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> @@ -161,16 +161,15 @@ static inline bool svc_put_not_last(struct svc_serv *serv)
> extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
> 
> /*
> - * RPC Requsts and replies are stored in one or more pages.
> + * RPC Requests and replies are stored in one or more pages.
>  * We maintain an array of pages for each server thread.
>  * Requests are copied into these pages as they arrive.  Remaining
>  * pages are available to write the reply into.
>  *
> - * Pages are sent using ->sendpage so each server thread needs to
> - * allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
> - * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live,
> - * and a send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part
> - * of a reply.
> + * Pages are sent using ->sendmsg with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES so each server thread
> + * needs to allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
> + * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live, and a
> + * send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part of a reply.
>  *
>  * We use xdr_buf for holding responses as it fits well with NFS
>  * read responses (that have a header, and some data pages, and possibly
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> index 03a4f5615086..af146e053dfc 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> @@ -1059,17 +1059,18 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> 	svc_xprt_received(rqstp->rq_xprt);
> 	return 0;	/* record not complete */
> }
> -
> + 
> static int svc_tcp_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, const struct kvec *vec,
> 			      int flags)
> {
> -	return kernel_sendpage(sock, virt_to_page(vec->iov_base),
> -			       offset_in_page(vec->iov_base),
> -			       vec->iov_len, flags);
> +	struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | flags, };
> +
> +	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, vec, 1, vec->iov_len);
> +	return sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> }
> 
> /*
> - * kernel_sendpage() is used exclusively to reduce the number of
> + * MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
>  * copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
>  * that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
>  *
> @@ -1109,28 +1110,13 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
> 	if (ret != head->iov_len)
> 		goto out;
> 
> -	if (xdr->page_len) {
> -		unsigned int offset, len, remaining;
> -		struct bio_vec *bvec;
> -
> -		bvec = xdr->bvec + (xdr->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> -		offset = offset_in_page(xdr->page_base);
> -		remaining = xdr->page_len;
> -		while (remaining > 0) {
> -			len = min(remaining, bvec->bv_len - offset);
> -			ret = kernel_sendpage(sock, bvec->bv_page,
> -					      bvec->bv_offset + offset,
> -					      len, 0);
> -			if (ret < 0)
> -				return ret;
> -			*sentp += ret;
> -			if (ret != len)
> -				goto out;
> -			remaining -= len;
> -			offset = 0;
> -			bvec++;
> -		}
> -	}
> +	msg.msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
> +	iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
> +		      xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
> +	ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	*sentp += ret;
> 
> 	if (tail->iov_len) {
> 		ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, tail, 0);
> 

--
Chuck Lever

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 40/48] sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage

[Daire Byrne]

I gave this a spin because I had noticed a previous regression around
the 5.7 time frame in sendpage/sendmsg code changes:

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209439

In that case there was a noticeable regression in performance for high
performance servers (100gbit).

I see no such performance problems with David's iov-sendpage branch
and it all looks good to me with simple benchmarks (100gbit server,
100 x 1gbit clients reading data).

Tested-by: Daire Byrne <daire@dneg.com>

Cheers,

Daire

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 at 17:37, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 2023, at 10:26 AM, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Don't. Just change svc_tcp_send_kvec() to use sock_sendmsg, and
> >> leave the marker alone for now, please.
> >
> > If you insist.  See attached.
>
> Very good, thank you for accommodating my regression paranoia.
>
> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
>
> >
> > David
> > ---
> > sunrpc: Use sendmsg(MSG_SPLICE_PAGES) rather then sendpage
> >
> > When transmitting data, call down into TCP using sendmsg with
> > MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to indicate that content should be spliced rather than
> > performing sendpage calls to transmit header, data pages and trailer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> > cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
> > cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> > cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> > cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> > cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> > cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> > cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
> > cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h |   11 +++++------
> > net/sunrpc/svcsock.c       |   40 +++++++++++++---------------------------
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> > index 877891536c2f..456ae554aa11 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc.h
> > @@ -161,16 +161,15 @@ static inline bool svc_put_not_last(struct svc_serv *serv)
> > extern u32 svc_max_payload(const struct svc_rqst *rqstp);
> >
> > /*
> > - * RPC Requsts and replies are stored in one or more pages.
> > + * RPC Requests and replies are stored in one or more pages.
> >  * We maintain an array of pages for each server thread.
> >  * Requests are copied into these pages as they arrive.  Remaining
> >  * pages are available to write the reply into.
> >  *
> > - * Pages are sent using ->sendpage so each server thread needs to
> > - * allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
> > - * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live,
> > - * and a send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part
> > - * of a reply.
> > + * Pages are sent using ->sendmsg with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES so each server thread
> > + * needs to allocate more to replace those used in sending.  To help keep track
> > + * of these pages we have a receive list where all pages initialy live, and a
> > + * send list where pages are moved to when there are to be part of a reply.
> >  *
> >  * We use xdr_buf for holding responses as it fits well with NFS
> >  * read responses (that have a header, and some data pages, and possibly
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > index 03a4f5615086..af146e053dfc 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > @@ -1059,17 +1059,18 @@ static int svc_tcp_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >       svc_xprt_received(rqstp->rq_xprt);
> >       return 0;       /* record not complete */
> > }
> > -
> > +
> > static int svc_tcp_send_kvec(struct socket *sock, const struct kvec *vec,
> >                             int flags)
> > {
> > -     return kernel_sendpage(sock, virt_to_page(vec->iov_base),
> > -                            offset_in_page(vec->iov_base),
> > -                            vec->iov_len, flags);
> > +     struct msghdr msg = { .msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | flags, };
> > +
> > +     iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, vec, 1, vec->iov_len);
> > +     return sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * kernel_sendpage() is used exclusively to reduce the number of
> > + * MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is used exclusively to reduce the number of
> >  * copy operations in this path. Therefore the caller must ensure
> >  * that the pages backing @xdr are unchanging.
> >  *
> > @@ -1109,28 +1110,13 @@ static int svc_tcp_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct xdr_buf *xdr,
> >       if (ret != head->iov_len)
> >               goto out;
> >
> > -     if (xdr->page_len) {
> > -             unsigned int offset, len, remaining;
> > -             struct bio_vec *bvec;
> > -
> > -             bvec = xdr->bvec + (xdr->page_base >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > -             offset = offset_in_page(xdr->page_base);
> > -             remaining = xdr->page_len;
> > -             while (remaining > 0) {
> > -                     len = min(remaining, bvec->bv_len - offset);
> > -                     ret = kernel_sendpage(sock, bvec->bv_page,
> > -                                           bvec->bv_offset + offset,
> > -                                           len, 0);
> > -                     if (ret < 0)
> > -                             return ret;
> > -                     *sentp += ret;
> > -                     if (ret != len)
> > -                             goto out;
> > -                     remaining -= len;
> > -                     offset = 0;
> > -                     bvec++;
> > -             }
> > -     }
> > +     msg.msg_flags = MSG_SPLICE_PAGES;
> > +     iov_iter_bvec(&msg.msg_iter, ITER_SOURCE, xdr->bvec,
> > +                   xdr_buf_pagecount(xdr), xdr->page_len);
> > +     ret = sock_sendmsg(sock, &msg);
> > +     if (ret < 0)
> > +             return ret;
> > +     *sentp += ret;
> >
> >       if (tail->iov_len) {
> >               ret = svc_tcp_send_kvec(sock, tail, 0);
> >
>
> --
> Chuck Lever
>
>