linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@RedHat.com>
To: Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] manpage: Add a description of the 'softreval' / 'nosoftreval' mount option
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:08:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2747d2f9-037b-a4ba-7d9b-64dc3e303e08@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200129154703.6204-2-steved@redhat.com>



On 1/29/20 10:47 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> 
> Add a description of the 'softreval' / 'nosoftreval' mount options on
> the 'nfs' generic manpage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Committed... (tag: nfs-utils-2-4-3-rc7)

steved.

> ---
>  utils/mount/nfs.man | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/utils/mount/nfs.man b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> index 84462cd..6f79c63 100644
> --- a/utils/mount/nfs.man
> +++ b/utils/mount/nfs.man
> @@ -121,6 +121,36 @@ option may mitigate some of the risks of using the
>  .B soft
>  option.
>  .TP 1.5i
> +.BR softreval " / " nosoftreval
> +In cases where the NFS server is down, it may be useful to
> +allow the NFS client to continue to serve up paths and
> +attributes from cache after
> +.B retrans
> +attempts to revalidate that cache have timed out.
> +This may, for instance, be helpful when trying to unmount a
> +filesystem tree from a server that is permanently down.
> +.IP
> +It is possible to combine
> +.BR softreval
> +with the
> +.B soft
> +mount option, in which case operations that cannot be served up
> +from cache will time out and return an error after
> +.B retrans
> +attempts. The combination with the default
> +.B hard
> +mount option implies those uncached operations will continue to
> +retry until a response is received from the server.
> +.IP
> +Note: the default mount option is
> +.BR nosoftreval
> +which disallows fallback to cache when revalidation fails, and
> +instead follows the behavior dictated by the
> +.B hard
> +or
> +.B soft
> +mount option.
> +.TP 1.5i
>  .BR intr " / " nointr
>  This option is provided for backward compatibility.
>  It is ignored after kernel 2.6.25.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-07 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-29 15:47 [PATCH 1/2] manpage: Add a description of the 'nconnect' mount option Steve Dickson
2020-01-29 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] manpage: Add a description of the 'softreval' / 'nosoftreval' " Steve Dickson
2020-02-07 16:08   ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2020-02-03 15:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] manpage: Add a description of the 'nconnect' " Olga Kornievskaia
2020-02-04 16:46   ` Steve Dickson
2020-02-04 17:13     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-02-04 17:22       ` Olga Kornievskaia
2020-02-04 17:36         ` Trond Myklebust
2020-02-07 16:08 ` Steve Dickson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2747d2f9-037b-a4ba-7d9b-64dc3e303e08@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).