From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:29850 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452Ab0I3Fqs (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:46:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA42437.3090102@parallels.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:46:31 +0400 From: Pavel Emelyanov To: Chuck Lever CC: "J. Bruce Fields" , Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] sunrpc: Create sockets in namespaces References: <4CA32AB4.2090808@parallels.com> <20100929214527.GC26180@fieldses.org> <0678928F-3DE0-4AB9-8CD9-7BDA3A362A20@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <0678928F-3DE0-4AB9-8CD9-7BDA3A362A20@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Shall I commit this to my for-2.6.37 tree? Objections? > > I think it looks OK. > > But I was wondering if there were any other changes needed for the RDMA > transport capability, or had we decided that would happen at a latter point, > or that changes are entirely unneeded We definitely need more changes in the RDMA transport, but I would like to have it done later (unless someone other than me starts doing it earlier ;) ). > (are namespaces already supported in the IB stack)? Nope. And this makes RDMA netnsization even more harder :(