From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:51026 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbeFFPsV (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:48:21 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] NFSv4.0: Remove transport protocol name from non-UCS client ID From: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 11:48:14 -0400 Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Message-Id: <73D2F6EC-8CE6-4290-9713-6D5B8B0DC2E3@oracle.com> References: <20180604144154.11877.19298.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20180604145334.11877.12862.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> To: Trond Myklebust Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Jun 6, 2018, at 11:44 AM, Trond Myklebust = wrote: >=20 > On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 10:53 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> Commit 69dd716c5ffd ("NFSv4: Add socket proto argument to >> setclientid") (2007) added the transport protocol name to the client >> ID string, but the patch description doesn't explain why this was >> necessary. >>=20 >> At that time, the only transport protocol name that would have been >> used is "tcp" (for both IPv4 and IPv6), resulting in no additional >> distinctiveness of the client ID string. >>=20 >> Since there is one client instance, the server should recognize it's >> state whether the client is connecting via TCP or RDMA. Same client, >> same lease. >=20 > The reason why this is the case now is because the trunking code > overrides the guardrails in nfs_get_client(). The latter does match on > the protocol. OK. Would that also true in the UCS case? -- Chuck Lever