linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: handle drc over-allocation gracefully.
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 16:15:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877e63a3yg.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919184139.GG26654@fieldses.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2472 bytes --]


Since commit de766e570413 ("nfsd: give out fewer session slots as
limit approaches") nfsd4_get_drc_mem() ensures 'avail' is always at
least 'slotsize', so the return value 'num' is always at least 1.

This means that:
1/ nfsd_drc_mem_used could exceed nfsd_drc_max_mem, which becomes
  a problem when we later perform an unsigned subtraction of
  the larger from the smaller to calculate 'total_avail'.
2/ Check the return value of nfsd4_get_drc_mem() against
  zero is pointless - the error code (which isn't actually correct
  according to RFC-5661) is never returned.

So avoid the integer overflow, and discard the check.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 7857942c5ca6..8c09ac49fff2 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -1570,11 +1570,21 @@ static u32 nfsd4_get_drc_mem(struct nfsd4_channel_attrs *ca)
 	unsigned long avail, total_avail;
 
 	spin_lock(&nfsd_drc_lock);
-	total_avail = nfsd_drc_max_mem - nfsd_drc_mem_used;
+	if (nfsd_drc_max_mem > nfsd_drc_mem_used)
+		total_avail = nfsd_drc_max_mem - nfsd_drc_mem_used;
+	else
+		/* We have handed out more space than we chose in
+		 * set_max_drc() to allow.  That isn't really a
+		 * problem as long as that doesn't make us thing we
+		 * have lots more due to integer overflow.
+		 */
+		total_avail = 0;
 	avail = min((unsigned long)NFSD_MAX_MEM_PER_SESSION, total_avail);
 	/*
 	 * Never use more than a third of the remaining memory,
 	 * unless it's the only way to give this client a slot:
+	 * Note that we always return at least 1 here, even if
+	 * we have exceeded nfsd_drc_max_mem.
 	 */
 	avail = clamp_t(unsigned long, avail, slotsize, total_avail/3);
 	num = min_t(int, num, avail / slotsize);
@@ -3169,10 +3179,10 @@ static __be32 check_forechannel_attrs(struct nfsd4_channel_attrs *ca, struct nfs
 	 * performance.  When short on memory we therefore prefer to
 	 * decrease number of slots instead of their size.  Clients that
 	 * request larger slots than they need will get poor results:
+	 * Note that we always allow at least one slot, because our
+	 * accounting is soft and provides no guarantees either way.
 	 */
 	ca->maxreqs = nfsd4_get_drc_mem(ca);
-	if (!ca->maxreqs)
-		return nfserr_jukebox;
 
 	return nfs_ok;
 }
-- 
2.23.0


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-20  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-25 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] tweak knfsd session slot table sizing J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-25 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: increase DRC cache limit J. Bruce Fields
2017-09-25 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] nfsd: give out fewer session slots as limit approaches J. Bruce Fields
2019-09-19  1:08   ` NeilBrown
2019-09-19 16:22     ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-09-19 17:17       ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-09-19 18:41         ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-09-20  6:15           ` NeilBrown [this message]
2019-09-20  6:33             ` [PATCH 1/2 - vers2] nfsd: handle drc over-allocation gracefully NeilBrown
2019-09-20  6:36               ` [PATCH - 2/2] nfsd: degraded slot-count more gracefully as allocation nears exhaustion NeilBrown
2019-09-20 16:28               ` [PATCH 1/2 - vers2] nfsd: handle drc over-allocation gracefully J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877e63a3yg.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=bfields@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).