From: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Count ops completing with tk_status < 0
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 10:27:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e5ab8dce77901ea7f34e5424a7d1c75ac7689ae.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604144535.GA19422@fieldses.org>
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 10:45 -0400, Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 02:56:29PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > On Jun 3, 2019, at 2:53 PM, Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 09:25 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > > > On May 30, 2019, at 6:33 PM, Bruce Fields <
> > > > > bfields@fieldses.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 06:19:54PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > > > > > We now have trace points that can do that too.
> > > > >
> > > > > You mean, that can report every error (and its value)?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, the nfs_xdr_status trace point reports the error by value
> > > > and
> > > > symbolic name.
> > >
> > > The tracepoint is very useful I agree. I don't think it will
> > > show:
> > > a) the mount
> > > b) the opcode
> > >
> > > Or am I mistaken and there's a way to get those with a filter or
> > > another tracepoint?
> >
> > The opcode can be exposed by another trace point, but the link
> > between
> > the two trace points is tenuous and could be improved.
> >
> > I don't believe any of the NFS trace points expose the mount. My
> > testing
> > is largely on a single mount so my imagination stopped there.
>
> Dumb question: is it possible to add more fields to tracepoints
> without
> breaking some kind of backwards compatibility?
>
> I wonder if adding, say, an xid and an xprt pointer to tracepoints
> when
> available would help with this kind of thing.
>
> In any case, I think Dave's stats will still be handy if only because
> they're on all the time.
>
> --b.
Trond or Anna, will you take this series for mountstats or are you
opposed to it?
I think it is useful in conjuction with the tracepoints because it is
always on and easy to know which mount is involved (we often start with
a customer saying mount XYZ has some issue or is hanging). If you see
problems or want other testing please let me know.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-07 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-23 20:13 [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Move call to rpc_count_iostats before rpc_call_done Dave Wysochanski
2019-05-23 20:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: Use proper printk specifiers for unsigned long long Dave Wysochanski
2019-05-23 20:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: Count ops completing with tk_status < 0 Dave Wysochanski
2019-05-30 21:38 ` J. Bruce Fields
2019-05-30 22:19 ` Chuck Lever
2019-05-30 22:33 ` Bruce Fields
2019-05-31 13:25 ` Chuck Lever
2019-06-03 18:53 ` Dave Wysochanski
2019-06-03 18:56 ` Chuck Lever
2019-06-03 19:05 ` Dave Wysochanski
2019-06-03 19:08 ` Chuck Lever
2019-06-04 14:45 ` Bruce Fields
2019-06-04 14:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-06-07 14:27 ` Dave Wysochanski [this message]
2019-05-31 0:17 ` David Wysochanski
2019-05-23 20:13 ` [PATCH] mountstats: add per-op error counts for mountstats command Dave Wysochanski
2019-05-23 20:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Dave Wysochanski
2019-06-03 14:31 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e5ab8dce77901ea7f34e5424a7d1c75ac7689ae.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).