linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "Cristian Marussi" <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: "Punit Agrawal" <punit.agrawal@arm.com>,
	"Linux NFS Mailing List" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [aarch64] refcount_t: use-after-free in NFS with 64k pages
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 07:14:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9C25D1F9-3A25-4CF3-822E-CE25829642D9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e99fd27b-9e60-22fc-af6b-da93b0e0ca0f@arm.com>

On 5 Feb 2019, at 7:10, Cristian Marussi wrote:

> Hi Ben
>
> On 05/02/2019 11:53, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
>> Hello Cristian and Punit,
>>
>> Did you ever get to the bottom of this one?  We just saw this on one 
>> run
>> of our 4.18.0-era ppc64le, and I'm wondering if we ever found the 
>> root
>> cause.
>
> unfortunately I stopped working actively on finding the root cause, 
> since I've
> found a viable workaround that let us unblock our broken LTP runs.
>
> Setting wsize=65536 in NFS bootparams completely solves the issue with 
> 64k pages
> (and does NOT break 4k either :D): this confirmed my hyp that there is 
> some sort
> of race when accounting refcounts during the lifetime of nfs_page 
> structs which
> leads to a misscounted refcount...but as I said I never looked back 
> into that
> again (but never say never...)
>
> Hope this helps...

Hmm, interesting..

Will you share your reproducer with me?  That will save me some time.

Ben

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-05 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-19 14:48 [aarch64] refcount_t: use-after-free in NFS with 64k pages Cristian Marussi
2018-10-19 15:18 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-10-19 15:35   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-02-05 11:53     ` Benjamin Coddington
2019-02-05 12:10       ` Cristian Marussi
2019-02-05 12:14         ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2019-02-05 12:37           ` Cristian Marussi
2019-02-05 12:50             ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9C25D1F9-3A25-4CF3-822E-CE25829642D9@redhat.com \
    --to=bcodding@redhat.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).