From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "Trond Myklebust" <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: dwysocha@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:49:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AF0AF7F0-EEA1-475B-987F-168724A83E60@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC49EB88-4B79-40FC-97C3-47D2A588F96C@redhat.com>
On 12 Nov 2020, at 13:39, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> On 12 Nov 2020, at 13:26, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 16:51 +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>
>>> I was going to ask you if perhaps reverting Scott's commit
>>> 07b5ce8ef2d8
>>> ("NFS: Make nfs_readdir revalidate less often") might help here?
>>> My thinking is that will trigger more cache invalidations when the
>>> directory is changing underneath us, and will now trigger uncached
>>> readdir in those situations.
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> IOW, the suggestion would be to apply something like the following on
>> top of the existing readdir patchset:
>
> I'm all for this approach, but - I'm rarely seeing the
> mapping->nrpages == 0
> since the cache is dropped by a process in nfs_readdir() that
> immediately
> starts filling the cache again.
>
> It would make a lot more sense to me if we could do something like
> stash
> desc->page_index << PAGE_SHIFT in f_pos after each nfs_readdir, then
> the
> hueristic could check f_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT > nrpages.
>
> Yes, f_pos is growing many different meanings in NFS directories,
> maybe we
> can stash it on the directory context.
Ignore the f_pos suggestion -- iterate_dir sets it for us.. would have
to use
a private value.
Ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 21:37 [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary inode locking in nfs_llseek_dir() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary inode lock in nfs_fsync_dir() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] NFSv4.2: condition READDIR's mask for security label based on LSM state trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] NFS: Ensure contents of struct nfs_open_dir_context are consistent trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] NFS: Clean up readdir struct nfs_cache_array trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] NFS: Clean up nfs_readdir_page_filler() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] NFS: Clean up directory array handling trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] NFS: Don't discard readdir results trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] NFS: Remove unnecessary kmap in nfs_readdir_xdr_to_array() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] NFS: Replace kmap() with kmap_atomic() in nfs_readdir_search_array() trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] NFS: Simplify struct nfs_cache_array_entry trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] NFS: Support larger readdir buffers trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] NFS: More readdir cleanups trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] NFS: nfs_do_filldir() does not return a value trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] NFS: Reduce readdir stack usage trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] NFS: Cleanup to remove nfs_readdir_descriptor_t typedef trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] NFS: Allow the NFS generic code to pass in a verifier to readdir trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] NFS: Handle NFS4ERR_NOT_SAME and NFSERR_BADCOOKIE from readdir calls trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] NFS: Improve handling of directory verifiers trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] NFS: Optimisations for monotonically increasing readdir cookies trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] NFS: Reduce number of RPC calls when doing uncached readdir trondmy
2020-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] NFS: Do uncached readdir when we're seeking a cookie in an empty page cache trondmy
2020-11-11 22:15 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] Readdir enhancements David Wysochanski
2020-11-12 11:41 ` David Wysochanski
2020-11-12 15:34 ` Guy Keren
2020-11-12 16:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 16:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 18:26 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 18:39 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 18:49 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
2020-11-12 19:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-11-12 19:09 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-12 20:23 ` Benjamin Coddington
2020-11-13 11:09 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2020-11-14 13:32 ` David Wysochanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AF0AF7F0-EEA1-475B-987F-168724A83E60@redhat.com \
--to=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=dwysocha@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).