linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>,
	linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID in LOCKU
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 15:37:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN-5tyGe3V-dAsrNwAVcqKA6dE747ry7C3bb72hGaFgUAGuCzQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190909140104.78818-9-trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>

Hi Trond,

I have a problem with this patch.

It sends an unlock with stateid of all zeros (gets a BAD_STATEID) and
then sends an unlock with a normal stateid. This can be seen running
nfstest_locking --nfsversion 4.1.

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:09 AM Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If a LOCKU request receives a NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID, then bump the
> seqid before resending. Ensure we only bump the seqid by 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 49f301198008..ecfaf4b1ba5d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -6377,6 +6377,42 @@ static int nfs4_proc_getlk(struct nfs4_state *state, int cmd, struct file_lock *
>         return err;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Update the seqid of a lock stateid after receiving
> + * NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID
> + */
> +static bool nfs4_refresh_lock_old_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst,
> +               struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp)
> +{
> +       struct nfs4_state *state = lsp->ls_state;
> +       bool ret = false;
> +
> +       spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
> +       if (!nfs4_stateid_match_other(dst, &lsp->ls_stateid))
> +               goto out;
> +       if (!nfs4_stateid_is_newer(&lsp->ls_stateid, dst))
> +               nfs4_stateid_seqid_inc(dst);
> +       else
> +               dst->seqid = lsp->ls_stateid.seqid;
> +       ret = true;
> +out:
> +       spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool nfs4_sync_lock_stateid(nfs4_stateid *dst,
> +               struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp)
> +{
> +       struct nfs4_state *state = lsp->ls_state;
> +       bool ret;
> +
> +       spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
> +       ret = !nfs4_stateid_match_other(dst, &lsp->ls_stateid);
> +       nfs4_stateid_copy(dst, &lsp->ls_stateid);
> +       spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  struct nfs4_unlockdata {
>         struct nfs_locku_args arg;
>         struct nfs_locku_res res;
> @@ -6448,10 +6484,14 @@ static void nfs4_locku_done(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>                                         task->tk_msg.rpc_cred);
>                         /* Fall through */
>                 case -NFS4ERR_BAD_STATEID:
> -               case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
>                 case -NFS4ERR_STALE_STATEID:
> -                       if (!nfs4_stateid_match(&calldata->arg.stateid,
> -                                               &calldata->lsp->ls_stateid))
> +                       if (nfs4_sync_lock_stateid(&calldata->arg.stateid,
> +                                               calldata->lsp))
> +                               rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
> +                       break;
> +               case -NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID:
> +                       if (nfs4_refresh_lock_old_stateid(&calldata->arg.stateid,
> +                                               calldata->lsp))
>                                 rpc_restart_call_prepare(task);
>                         break;
>                 default:
> @@ -6474,7 +6514,6 @@ static void nfs4_locku_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
>
>         if (nfs_wait_on_sequence(calldata->arg.seqid, task) != 0)
>                 goto out_wait;
> -       nfs4_stateid_copy(&calldata->arg.stateid, &calldata->lsp->ls_stateid);
>         if (test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &calldata->lsp->ls_flags) == 0) {
>                 /* Note: exit _without_ running nfs4_locku_done */
>                 goto out_no_action;
> --
> 2.21.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-16 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-09 14:00 [PATCH 1/9] pNFS: Ensure we do clear the return-on-close layout stateid on fatal errors Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:00 ` [PATCH 2/9] NFSv4: Clean up pNFS return-on-close error handling Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:00   ` [PATCH 3/9] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_DELAY correctly in return-on-close Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:00     ` [PATCH 4/9] NFSv4: Handle RPC level errors in LAYOUTRETURN Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:01       ` [PATCH 5/9] NFSv4: Add a helper to increment stateid seqids Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:01         ` [PATCH 6/9] pNFS: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID on layoutreturn by bumping the state seqid Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:01           ` [PATCH 7/9] NFSv4: Fix OPEN_DOWNGRADE error handling Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:01             ` [PATCH 8/9] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID in CLOSE/OPEN_DOWNGRADE Trond Myklebust
2019-09-09 14:01               ` [PATCH 9/9] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID in LOCKU Trond Myklebust
2019-09-16 19:37                 ` Olga Kornievskaia [this message]
2019-09-11 20:13               ` [PATCH 8/9] NFSv4: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID in CLOSE/OPEN_DOWNGRADE Olga Kornievskaia
2019-09-11 20:56                 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-09-12 15:01                   ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-09-12 15:04                     ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-09-16 19:39                     ` Olga Kornievskaia
2019-09-12 15:14           ` [PATCH 6/9] pNFS: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID on layoutreturn by bumping the state seqid Olga Kornievskaia
2019-09-12 16:29             ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN-5tyGe3V-dAsrNwAVcqKA6dE747ry7C3bb72hGaFgUAGuCzQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=aglo@umich.edu \
    --cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).