linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: recent intermittent fsx-related failures
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 17:26:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DF5259C4-56A1-4AEA-A06E-EAE235AFC04F@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa2ef2bbb991d693009fb5cf130462a366f5d459.camel@hammerspace.com>


> On Sep 24, 2021, at 6:09 PM, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2021-09-24 at 15:30 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 21, 2021, at 3:00 PM, Trond Myklebust
>>> <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 23:03 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 23, 2021, at 4:24 PM, Trond Myklebust
>>>>> <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 20:12 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>>>> Hi-
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I noticed recently that generic/075, generic/112, and
>>>>>> generic/127
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> failing intermittently on NFSv3 mounts. All three of these
>>>>>> tests
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> based on fsx.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> "git bisect" landed on this commit:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 7b24dacf0840 ("NFS: Another inode revalidation improvement")
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> After reverting 7b24dacf0840 on v5.14-rc1, I can no longer
>>>>>> reproduce
>>>>>> the test failures.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> So you are seeing file metadata updates that end up not
>>>>> changing
>>>>> the
>>>>> ctime?
>>>> 
>>>> As far as I can tell, a WRITE and two SETATTRs are happening in
>>>> sequence to the same file during the same jiffy. The WRITE does
>>>> not report pre/post attributes, but the SETATTRs do. The reported
>>>> pre- and post- mtime and ctime are all the same value for both
>>>> SETATTRs, I believe due to timestamp_truncate().
>>>> 
>>>> My theory is that persistent-storage-backed filesystems seem to
>>>> go slow enough that it doesn't become a significant problem. But
>>>> with tmpfs, this can happen often enough that the client gets
>>>> confused. And I can make the problem unreproducable if I enable
>>>> enough debugging paraphernalia on the server to slow it down.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm not exactly sure how the client becomes confused by this
>>>> behavior, but fsx reports a stale size value, or it can hit a
>>>> bus error. I'm seeing at least four of the fsx-based xfs tests
>>>> fail intermittently.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The client no longer relies on post-op attributes in order to
>>> update
>>> the metadata after a successful SETATTR. If you look at
>>> nfs_setattr_update_inode() you'll see that it picks the values that
>>> were set directly from the iattr argument.
>>> 
>>> The post-op attributes are only used to determine the implicit
>>> timestamp updates, and to detect any other updates that may have
>>> happened.
>> 
>> I've been able to directly and repeatedly observe the size attribute
>> reverting to a previous value.
>> 
>> The issue stems from the MM driving a background readahead operation
>> at the same time the application truncates or extends the file. The
>> READ starts before the size-mutating operation and completes after
>> it.
>> 
>> If the server happens to have done the READ before the size-mutating
>> operation, the READ result contains the previous size value. When
>> the READ completes, the client overwrites the more recent size
>> value with the stale one.
>> 
>> I'm not yet sure how this relates to
>> 
>> 7b24dacf0840 ("NFS: Another inode revalidation improvement")
>> 
>> and maybe it doesn't. "git bisect" with an unreliable reproducer
>> generates notoriously noisy data. 
> 
> Hmm... That makes sense. If so, the issue is the attributes from the
> READ end up tricking nfs_inode_finish_partial_attr_update() into OKing
> the update because the ctime ends up looking the same, and so the
> client tries to opportunistically revalidate the cache that was (for
> some reason) already marked as being invalid.

That agrees with the behavior I'm able to observe.

I sprinkled in extra tracing to get more visibility on what's
happening. The XDR decoders report the file's size as returned
by the server. I also added events in readpages to note when
a readahead starts. Finally, a few new tracepoints show the
cache and fattr validity flags used to make cache update
decisions.

An excerpt with annotations follows. Throughout this part of
the trace, the iversion remains at 1752899367783879642.


# The MM starts the readahead operation here

             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823097: nfs_aops_readpages:   fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 nr_pages=7
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823102: nfs_initiate_read:    fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 offset=114688 count=28672

# This is a concurrent truncating SETATTR

             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823109: nfs_setattr_enter:    fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823109: nfs_writeback_inode_enter: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823109: nfs_writeback_inode_exit: error=0 (OK) fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 type=8 (REG) version=1752899367783879642 size=151896 cache_validity=0x2000 (DATA_INVAL_DEFER) nfs_flags=0x4 (ACL_LRU_SET)

# This is the new size value carried by the SETATTR reply

             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823136: bprint:               nfs3_xdr_dec_setattr3res: task:61174@5 size=0x3ab89

# This event captures the client adjusting the inode's size

             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823137: nfs_size_truncate:    fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 old size=151896 new size=240521

# Here, refresh_inode_locked is shunted to check_inode_attributes,
# which decides not to update the inode's size again

             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823138: bprint:               nfs_inode_attrs_cmp: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 res=0
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823138: nfs_refresh_inode_enter: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823138: nfs_partial_attr_update: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 cache_validity=DATA_INVAL_DEFER fattr_validity=TYPE|MODE|NLINK|OWNER|GROUP|RDEV|SIZE|PRE_SIZE|SPACE_USED|FSID|FILEID|ATIME|MTIME|CTIME|PRE_MTIME|PRE_CTIME|CHANGE|PRE_CHANGE
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823139: nfs_check_attrs:      fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 valid_flags=
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823139: nfs_refresh_inode_exit: error=0 (OK) fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 type=8 (REG) version=1752899367783879642 size=240521 cache_validity=0x2000 (DATA_INVAL_DEFER) nfs_flags=0x4 (ACL_LRU_SET)
             fsx-1387  [006]   391.823139: nfs_setattr_exit:     error=0 (OK) fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 type=8 (REG) version=1752899367783879642 size=240521 cache_validity=0x2000 (DATA_INVAL_DEFER) nfs_flags=0x4 (ACL_LRU_SET)

# Then the readahead completes. The size carried by that READ result
# is also captured here

   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823090: nfs_readpage_done:    fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 offset=49152 count=65536 res=65536 status=65536
   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823142: bprint:               nfs3_xdr_dec_read3res: task:61173@5 size=0x25158

# inode_attrs_cmp returns zero also in this case. Prior to 7b24dac
# this would have been enough to block the following size update.

   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823143: bprint:               nfs_inode_attrs_cmp: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 res=0

   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823143: nfs_refresh_inode_enter: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642
   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823143: nfs_partial_attr_update: fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 cache_validity=INVALID_ATIME|DATA_INVAL_DEFER fattr_validity=TYPE|MODE|NLINK|OWNER|GROUP|RDEV|SIZE|SPACE_USED|FSID|FILEID|ATIME|MTIME|CTIME|CHANGE

# refresh_inode_locked decides to invoke nfs_update_inode instead
# of check_inode_attributes, and that reverts the SETATTR's size
# change

   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823144: nfs_size_update:      fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 version=1752899367783879642 old size=240521 new size=151896

   kworker/u24:9-193   [005]   391.823144: nfs_refresh_inode_exit: error=0 (OK) fileid=00:28:2 fhandle=0x36fbbe51 type=8 (REG) version=1752899367783879642 size=151896 cache_validity=0x2000 (DATA_INVAL_DEFER) nfs_flags=0x4 (ACL_LRU_SET)
 
I apologize for this taking so long to diagnose. I was only
recently able to derive a reproducer that is reliable enough
to make steady progress. Fwiw, I'm now using:

# fsx -q -l 262144 -o 65536 -S 191110531 -N 1000000 -R -W fsx_std_nommap

on an NFSv3 over RDMA mount point against a tmpfs share. This
is taken from generic/127 but -N is increased from 100,000 to
a million.


--
Chuck Lever




      reply	other threads:[~2021-09-25 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-23 20:12 recent intermittent fsx-related failures Chuck Lever III
2021-07-23 20:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2021-07-23 21:31   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-08-23 15:21     ` Chuck Lever III
2021-09-19 23:03   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-09-19 23:19     ` Trond Myklebust
2021-09-20 20:05       ` Chuck Lever III
2021-09-21 19:00     ` Trond Myklebust
2021-09-24 15:30       ` Chuck Lever III
2021-09-24 22:09         ` Trond Myklebust
2021-09-25 17:26           ` Chuck Lever III [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DF5259C4-56A1-4AEA-A06E-EAE235AFC04F@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).