linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Don't allow compiler optimisation of svc_xprt_release_slot()
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 23:40:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0493a5f022a666779d19fde5cdfbfdf9c7316c4.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190103224529.GA6907@fieldses.org>

On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 17:45 -0500, J Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 09:17:12AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > Use READ_ONCE() to tell the compiler to not optimse away the read
> > of
> > xprt->xpt_flags in svc_xprt_release_slot().
> 
> What exactly is the possible race here?  And why is a READ_ONCE()
> sufficient, as opposed to some memory barriers?
> 
> I may need to shut myself in a room with memory-barriers.txt, I'm
> pretty
> hazy on these things.
> 

It's not about fixing any races. It is about ensuring that the compiler
does not optimise away the read if the function is ever called from
inside a loop. Not an important fix, since I'm not aware of any cases
where this has happened. However strictly speaking, we should use
READ_ONCE() here because that variable is volatile; it can be changed
by a background action.

> --b.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> > ---
> >  net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > index 51d36230b6e3..94d344325e22 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> > @@ -363,9 +363,11 @@ static void svc_xprt_release_slot(struct
> > svc_rqst *rqstp)
> >  
> >  static bool svc_xprt_has_something_to_do(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
> >  {
> > -	if (xprt->xpt_flags & ((1<<XPT_CONN)|(1<<XPT_CLOSE)))
> > +	unsigned long xpt_flags = READ_ONCE(xprt->xpt_flags);
> > +
> > +	if (xpt_flags & (BIT(XPT_CONN) | BIT(XPT_CLOSE)))
> >  		return true;
> > -	if (xprt->xpt_flags & ((1<<XPT_DATA)|(1<<XPT_DEFERRED))) {
> > +	if (xpt_flags & (BIT(XPT_DATA) | BIT(XPT_DEFERRED))) {
> >  		if (xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_has_wspace(xprt) &&
> >  		    svc_xprt_slots_in_range(xprt))
> >  			return true;
> > -- 
> > 2.20.1
-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com



  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-03 23:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-03 14:17 [PATCH] SUNRPC: Don't allow compiler optimisation of svc_xprt_release_slot() Trond Myklebust
2019-01-03 22:45 ` J Bruce Fields
2019-01-03 23:40   ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2019-01-04 17:39     ` bfields
2019-01-07 21:32       ` bfields
2019-01-07 22:06         ` Trond Myklebust
2019-01-08 15:01           ` bfields
2019-01-08 16:21             ` Trond Myklebust
2019-01-09 16:51               ` bfields
2019-01-09 17:41                 ` Trond Myklebust
2019-01-11 21:12                   ` bfields
2019-01-11 21:52                     ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-11 21:54                       ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-11 22:10                         ` Bruce Fields
2019-01-11 22:27                           ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-12  0:56                             ` Bruce Fields
2019-01-14 17:24                               ` Chuck Lever
2019-01-25 20:30                                 ` Bruce Fields
2019-01-25 21:32                                   ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a0493a5f022a666779d19fde5cdfbfdf9c7316c4.camel@hammerspace.com \
    --to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).