From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/12] device-dax: Support sub-dividing soft-reserved ranges
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 16:54:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158500767138.2088294.17131646259803932461.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
The device-dax facility allows an address range to be directly mapped
through a chardev, or turned around and hotplugged to the core kernel
page allocator as System-RAM. It is the baseline mechanism for
converting persistent memory (pmem) to be used as another volatile
memory pool i.e. the current Memory Tiering hot topic on linux-mm.
In the case of pmem the nvdimm-namespace-label mechanism can sub-divide
it, but that labeling mechanism is not available / applicable to
soft-reserved ("EFI specific purpose") memory [1]. This series provides
a sysfs-mechanism for the daxctl utility to enable provisioning of
volatile-soft-reserved memory ranges.
The motivations for this facility are:
1/ Allow performance differentiated memory ranges to be split between
kernel-managed and directly-accessed use cases.
2/ Allow physical memory to be provisioned along performance relevant
address boundaries. For example, divide a memory-side cache [2] along
cache-color boundaries.
3/ Parcel out soft-reserved memory to VMs using device-dax as a security
/ permissions boundary [3]. Specifically I have seen people (ab)using
memmap=nn!ss (mark System-RAM as Peristent Memory) just to get the
device-dax interface on custom address ranges.
The baseline for this series is today's next/master + "[PATCH v2 0/6]
Manual definition of Soft Reserved memory devices" [4].
Big thanks to Joao for the early testing and feedback on this series!
Given the dependencies on the memremap_pages() reworks in Andrew's tree
and the proximity to v5.7 this is clearly v5.8 material. The patches in
most need of a second opinion are the memremap_pages() reworks to switch
from 'struct resource' to 'struct range' and allow for an array of
ranges to be mapped at once.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/157309097008.1579826.12818463304589384434.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/154899811738.3165233.12325692939590944259.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200110190313.17144-1-joao.m.martins@oracle.com/
[4]: http://lore.kernel.org/r/158489354353.1457606.8327903161927980740.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com/
---
Dan Williams (12):
device-dax: Drop the dax_region.pfn_flags attribute
device-dax: Move instance creation parameters to 'struct dev_dax_data'
device-dax: Make pgmap optional for instance creation
device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res
device-dax: Add an allocation interface for device-dax instances
device-dax: Introduce seed devices
drivers/base: Make device_find_child_by_name() compatible with sysfs inputs
device-dax: Add resize support
mm/memremap_pages: Convert to 'struct range'
mm/memremap_pages: Support multiple ranges per invocation
device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support
device-dax: Introduce 'mapping' devices
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_uvmem.c | 14 -
drivers/base/core.c | 2
drivers/dax/bus.c | 877 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/dax/bus.h | 28 +
drivers/dax/dax-private.h | 36 +
drivers/dax/device.c | 97 ++--
drivers/dax/hmem/hmem.c | 18 -
drivers/dax/kmem.c | 170 +++---
drivers/dax/pmem/compat.c | 2
drivers/dax/pmem/core.c | 22 +
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 4
drivers/nvdimm/badrange.c | 26 -
drivers/nvdimm/claim.c | 13
drivers/nvdimm/nd.h | 3
drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 13
drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c | 27 +
drivers/nvdimm/region.c | 21 -
drivers/pci/p2pdma.c | 12
include/linux/memremap.h | 9
include/linux/range.h | 6
mm/memremap.c | 297 ++++++-----
tools/testing/nvdimm/dax-dev.c | 22 +
tools/testing/nvdimm/test/iomap.c | 2
23 files changed, 1318 insertions(+), 403 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-23 23:54 Dan Williams [this message]
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 01/12] device-dax: Drop the dax_region.pfn_flags attribute Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 02/12] device-dax: Move instance creation parameters to 'struct dev_dax_data' Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 03/12] device-dax: Make pgmap optional for instance creation Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:54 ` [PATCH 04/12] device-dax: Kill dax_kmem_res Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 05/12] device-dax: Add an allocation interface for device-dax instances Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 06/12] device-dax: Introduce seed devices Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 07/12] drivers/base: Make device_find_child_by_name() compatible with sysfs inputs Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 08/12] device-dax: Add resize support Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 09/12] mm/memremap_pages: Convert to 'struct range' Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 10/12] mm/memremap_pages: Support multiple ranges per invocation Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 11/12] device-dax: Add dis-contiguous resource support Dan Williams
2020-03-24 16:12 ` Joao Martins
2020-03-25 10:35 ` Joao Martins
2020-03-25 17:48 ` Dan Williams
2020-03-26 17:49 ` Joao Martins
2020-07-11 0:44 ` Dan Williams
2020-04-06 10:43 ` Joao Martins
2020-04-06 20:22 ` Dan Williams
2020-07-11 0:47 ` Dan Williams
2020-05-12 14:36 ` Joao Martins
2020-07-11 0:52 ` Dan Williams
2020-03-23 23:55 ` [PATCH 12/12] device-dax: Introduce 'mapping' devices Dan Williams
2020-03-24 16:27 ` Joao Martins
2020-03-24 23:51 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158500767138.2088294.17131646259803932461.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).