From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] drivers/base: Introduce kill_device() Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 00:45:32 +0000 Message-ID: <20190719004532.C503221850@mail.kernel.org> References: <156341207332.292348.14959761496009347574.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <156341207332.292348.14959761496009347574.stgit-p8uTFz9XbKj2zm6wflaqv1nYeNYlB/vhral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" To: Sasha Levin , Dan Williams , linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" List-Id: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 4d88a97aa9e8 libnvdimm, nvdimm: dimm driver and base libnvdimm device-driver infrastructure. The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.1, v5.1.18, v4.19.59, v4.14.133, v4.9.185, v4.4.185. v5.2.1: Build OK! v5.1.18: Build OK! v4.19.59: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3451a495ef24 ("driver core: Establish order of operations for device_add and device_del via bitflag") v4.14.133: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3451a495ef24 ("driver core: Establish order of operations for device_add and device_del via bitflag") v4.9.185: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3451a495ef24 ("driver core: Establish order of operations for device_add and device_del via bitflag") v4.4.185: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 3451a495ef24 ("driver core: Establish order of operations for device_add and device_del via bitflag") 656b8035b0ee ("ARM: 8524/1: driver cohandle -EPROBE_DEFER from bus_type.match()") NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha