From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA13C5DF60 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DB9221882 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:13:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4DB9221882 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from new-ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C55100EA625; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=45.79.88.28; helo=ms.lwn.net; envelope-from=corbet@lwn.net; receiver= Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD4B100EEB95 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 12:15:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED69F6EC; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:13:13 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Maintainer Handbook: Maintainer Entry Profile Message-ID: <20191107131313.26b2d2cc@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20191001075559.629eb059@lwn.net> References: <156821692280.2951081.18036584954940423225.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <156821693396.2951081.7340292149329436920.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20191001075559.629eb059@lwn.net> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: WEUJP2WQ63R7BW36UQTSJH3PSERUSRGB X-Message-ID-Hash: WEUJP2WQ63R7BW36UQTSJH3PSERUSRGB X-MailFrom: corbet@lwn.net X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Steve French , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Torvalds , "Tobin C. Harding" , Olof Johansson , Daniel Vetter , Joe Perches , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexandre Belloni , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Dan, A month or so ago I wrote... > > See Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst for more details, > > and a follow-on example profile for the libnvdimm subsystem. > > Thus far, the maintainer guide is focused on how to *be* a maintainer. > This document, instead, is more about how to deal with specific > maintainers. So I suspect that Documentation/maintainer might be the > wrong place for it. > > Should we maybe place it instead under Documentation/process, or even > create a new top-level "book" for this information? Unless I missed it, I've not heard back from you on this. I'd like to get this stuff pulled in for 5.5 if possible... would you object if I were to apply your patches, then tack on a move over to the process guide? Thanks, jon _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org