From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75D2C433E0 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCC38206C3 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HxDa1xFa" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BCC38206C3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1149C11FC564B; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:54:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; receiver= Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 548EE11FC5648 for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:54:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7061206B6; Fri, 22 May 2020 11:58:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590148683; bh=i73lIcu8dbreoO8obOxlyGP8aRtVvKMSUrIAxBKQ5sE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HxDa1xFahyEe06z1Ou+CNgPH9HX4eD62wMLeUU9BMpbjQPALTjvGznv84gDb3ABRX 5RRFuKTyPUZ65qrhpd5rPHGrNAwVd0xLEZgLkuKR8iMY+IwjumgCy3TxNoj9e5XtY6 qB54WbrTNgRD2a4B1HtzL9ZwBqP3MHlcub3AakdI= Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:58:00 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Dan Williams Subject: Re: [5.4-stable PATCH 0/7] libnvdimm: Cross-arch compatible namespace alignment Message-ID: <20200522115800.GA1451824@kroah.com> References: <159010426294.1062454.8853083370975871627.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <159010426294.1062454.8853083370975871627.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID-Hash: YXYXGBXG6RUW76WWHSWPZWNIOOOE7JWM X-Message-ID-Hash: YXYXGBXG6RUW76WWHSWPZWNIOOOE7JWM X-MailFrom: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: stable@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras , Christoph Hellwig , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 04:37:43PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Hello stable team, > > These patches have been shipping in mainline since v5.7-rc1 with no > reported issues. They address long standing problems in libnvdimm's > handling of namespace provisioning relative to alignment constraints > including crashes trying to even load the driver on some PowerPC > configurations. > > I did fold one build fix [1] into "libnvdimm/region: Introduce an 'align' > attribute" so as to not convey the bisection breakage to -stable. > > Please consider them for v5.4-stable. They do pass the latest > version of the ndctl unit tests. What about 5.6.y? Any user upgrading from 5.4-stable to 5.6-stable would hit a regression, right? So can we get a series backported to 5.6.y as well? I need that before I can take this series. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org