From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 02/17] x86/fpu: Refactor arch_set_user_pkey_access() for PKS support
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:13:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200720091356.GL10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f9586df-cabb-c743-1eeb-f44c73459fb5@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 03:36:12PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 7/17/20 1:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > This is unbelievable junk...
>
> Ouch!
>
> This is from the original user pkeys implementation.
The thing I fell over most was new in this patch; the naming of that
function. It doesn't 'get' anything, nor does it allocate anything, so
'new' is out the window too.
> > How about something like:
> >
> > u32 update_pkey_reg(u32 pk_reg, int pkey, unsigned int flags)
> > {
> > int pkey_shift = pkey * PKR_BITS_PER_PKEY;
> >
> > pk_reg &= ~(((1 << PKR_BITS_PER_PKEY) - 1) << pkey_shift);
> >
> > if (flags & PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS)
> > pk_reg |= PKR_AD_BIT << pkey_shift;
> > if (flags & PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
> > pk_reg |= PKR_WD_BIT << pkey_shift;
> >
> > return pk_reg;
> > }
> >
> > Then we at least have a little clue wtf the thing does.. Yes I started
> > with a rename and then got annoyed at the implementation too.
>
> That's fine, if some comments get added.
I'm not sure what you would want commented; the code is trivial.
> It looks correct to me but
> probably compiles down to pretty much the same thing as what was there.
> FWIW, I prefer the explicit masking off of two bit values to implicit
> masking off with a mask generated from PKR_BITS_PER_PKEY. It's
> certainly more compact, but I usually don't fret over the lines of code.
This way you're sure there are no bits missed. Both the shift and mask
use the same value.
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-20 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-17 7:20 [PATCH RFC V2 00/17] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 01/17] x86/pkeys: Create pkeys_internal.h ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 02/17] x86/fpu: Refactor arch_set_user_pkey_access() for PKS support ira.weiny
2020-07-17 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 20:52 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-20 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 22:36 ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-20 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 03/17] x86/pks: Enable Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 04/17] x86/pks: Preserve the PKRS MSR on context switch ira.weiny
2020-07-17 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 21:39 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-17 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 22:34 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-20 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-20 18:35 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 05/17] x86/pks: Add PKS kernel API ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 06/17] x86/pks: Add a debugfs file for allocated PKS keys ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 07/17] Documentation/pkeys: Update documentation for kernel pkeys ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 08/17] x86/pks: Add PKS Test code ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 09/17] memremap: Convert devmap static branch to {inc,dec} ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 10/17] fs/dax: Remove unused size parameter ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 11/17] drivers/dax: Expand lock scope to cover the use of addresses ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 12/17] memremap: Add zone device access protection ira.weiny
2020-07-17 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-18 5:06 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-20 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-18 5:51 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-17 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 13/17] kmap: Add stray write protection for device pages ira.weiny
2020-07-17 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-19 4:13 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-20 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 16:31 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 14/17] dax: Stray write protection for dax_direct_access() ira.weiny
2020-07-17 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-19 4:41 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 15/17] nvdimm/pmem: Stray write protection for pmem->virt_addr ira.weiny
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 16/17] [dax|pmem]: Enable stray write protection ira.weiny
2020-07-17 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 7:20 ` [PATCH RFC V2 17/17] x86/entry: Preserve PKRS MSR across exceptions ira.weiny
2020-07-17 9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-21 18:01 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-21 19:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-17 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-22 5:27 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-22 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-22 21:24 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-23 20:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 20:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-24 17:23 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-24 17:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-24 19:43 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-22 16:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-23 16:18 ` Fenghua Yu
2020-07-23 16:23 ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-23 16:52 ` Fenghua Yu
2020-07-23 17:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-23 17:30 ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-23 20:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 20:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 21:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-23 22:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 19:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 22:04 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-23 23:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-24 21:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-24 21:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-25 0:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-27 20:59 ` Ira Weiny
2020-07-24 22:19 ` [PATCH RFC V2 00/17] PKS: Add Protection Keys Supervisor (PKS) support Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200720091356.GL10769@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).