From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BDEC433E0 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 13:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5984023131 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 13:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sHWsqQ3T" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5984023131 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB3A1185766B; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62d; helo=mail-ej1-x62d.google.com; envelope-from=mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com; receiver= Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1980510FC3BC5; Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id m22so7238100eje.10; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:34:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rHqK38RuQ1sMAtSHsZ2jsHuSBhnKgRChw9PQXC5x/g8=; b=sHWsqQ3TaSk6xJtrxM7Zc2Si/hyLogx7R6vH44UqXNDLOarqWO/Vwyj5oMFdsWhsrq vXDe+POevMDU6Qf182IB0fgloTCU8P58rQAb/o3VmZS8mt7vs97r4K/faIC4dqGN4S/I uA0IpIurwug134o9qyzqFXZxk4EtAOAojb9Gp7cU3iNfBPhaSAZNSquAnQclz3EdEzNQ 4gWTte+o0J7cVAlT9UNY3fdAKLHzw6XP0FNAS3cT05jhD+aK/24wmYZfVsn/HHX7qYjc ZRNJZCokPsmV/7mTUxcySkX9qKCivK9hIKO4kxK4iGGHNun7KSL9ySXvV4MSchWCd27O nhnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=rHqK38RuQ1sMAtSHsZ2jsHuSBhnKgRChw9PQXC5x/g8=; b=eMR3eyOBqLHzbrGzOe1HRbBreFx0YTORJ0fJGiM+c8i1bk6ZsxIStly4ODfbmn718Q xGfS61di/ElfluNMK6qUOMF73WIS5H7f+zIuZt4+LodQBiEmm1NPt/5VuzbVI9C7iN6F fdFyqABo4g9YPYn60eWG28fg2YhSMgie5H26VISkl/TViZhKvDh4EVxMmk1mhN+soadL qhf2m3DgEg8723j0Sd43OfAn8POgASQRzUcDwnl6IANXs8vJ/mmghUHIlm5B46Pt9Xz3 /OLIL6hK9yszJCWvGcUVi+uxFBNTVzlws/xONuE5cMAQFyXRpyHvu0vR23xSkBNv00va Af0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335bvjJvLaN/S4qZEf+NWUNET3SLhXrZQd+aHHKvKf2dd8KYfUz KVZMxpx3Mcb2iaM6JkF+w+M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxA45bEMOJ9OTb4XWQbJNSFMMrPISkudFSUfT5Q7ezhysd1aO9TdtNGzvcZBPBZPfEKv3sVkg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a201:: with SMTP id r1mr4317065ejy.432.1596720896099; Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (54033286.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [84.3.50.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x1sm3665602ejc.119.2020.08.06.06.34.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Aug 2020 06:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 15:34:52 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: kernel test robot , Dan Williams Subject: Re: [x86/copy_mc] a0ac629ebe: fio.read_iops -43.3% regression Message-ID: <20200806133452.GA2077191@gmail.com> References: <159630256804.3143511.8894023468833792004.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200803094257.GA23458@shao2-debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200803094257.GA23458@shao2-debian> Message-ID-Hash: U3UW3OIKBU2NMCWRA3Z35SVDM2GA34GN X-Message-ID-Hash: U3UW3OIKBU2NMCWRA3Z35SVDM2GA34GN X-MailFrom: mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation CC: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Tony Luck , Erwin Tsaur , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 0day robot , lkp@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit * kernel test robot wrote: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -43.3% regression of fio.read_iops due to commit: > > > commit: a0ac629ebe7b3d248cb93807782a00d9142fdb98 ("x86/copy_mc: Introduce copy_mc_generic()") > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Williams/Renovate-memcpy_mcsafe-with-copy_mc_to_-user-kernel/20200802-014046 > > > in testcase: fio-basic > on test machine: 96 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 256G memory > with following parameters: So this performance regression, if it isn't a spurious result, looks concerning. Is this expected? Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org