From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] kernel/resource: make release_mem_region_adjustable() never fail
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:13:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200910091340.8654-2-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200910091340.8654-1-david@redhat.com>
Let's make sure splitting a resource on memory hotunplug will never fail.
This will become more relevant once we merge selected System RAM
resources - then, we'll trigger that case more often on memory hotunplug.
In general, this function is already unlikely to fail. When we remove
memory, we free up quite a lot of metadata (memmap, page tables, memory
block device, etc.). The only reason it could really fail would be when
injecting allocation errors.
All other error cases inside release_mem_region_adjustable() seem to be
sanity checks if the function would be abused in different context -
let's add WARN_ON_ONCE() in these cases so we can catch them.
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/ioport.h | 4 ++--
kernel/resource.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 22 +------------------
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
index 6c2b06fe8beb7..52a91f5fa1a36 100644
--- a/include/linux/ioport.h
+++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
@@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ extern struct resource * __request_region(struct resource *,
extern void __release_region(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
resource_size_t);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
-extern int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
- resource_size_t);
+extern void release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *, resource_size_t,
+ resource_size_t);
#endif
/* Wrappers for managed devices */
diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index f1175ce93a1d5..36b3552210120 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -1258,21 +1258,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__release_region);
* assumes that all children remain in the lower address entry for
* simplicity. Enhance this logic when necessary.
*/
-int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
- resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
+void release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
+ resource_size_t start, resource_size_t size)
{
+ struct resource *new_res = NULL;
+ bool alloc_nofail = false;
struct resource **p;
struct resource *res;
- struct resource *new_res;
resource_size_t end;
- int ret = -EINVAL;
end = start + size - 1;
- if ((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end))
- return ret;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE((start < parent->start) || (end > parent->end)))
+ return;
- /* The alloc_resource() result gets checked later */
- new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL);
+ /*
+ * We free up quite a lot of memory on memory hotunplug (esp., memap),
+ * just before releasing the region. This is highly unlikely to
+ * fail - let's play save and make it never fail as the caller cannot
+ * perform any error handling (e.g., trying to re-add memory will fail
+ * similarly).
+ */
+retry:
+ new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_KERNEL | alloc_nofail ? __GFP_NOFAIL : 0);
p = &parent->child;
write_lock(&resource_lock);
@@ -1298,7 +1305,6 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
* so if we are dealing with them, let us just back off here.
*/
if (!(res->flags & IORESOURCE_SYSRAM)) {
- ret = 0;
break;
}
@@ -1315,20 +1321,23 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
/* free the whole entry */
*p = res->sibling;
free_resource(res);
- ret = 0;
} else if (res->start == start && res->end != end) {
/* adjust the start */
- ret = __adjust_resource(res, end + 1,
- res->end - end);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, end + 1,
+ res->end - end));
} else if (res->start != start && res->end == end) {
/* adjust the end */
- ret = __adjust_resource(res, res->start,
- start - res->start);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, res->start,
+ start - res->start));
} else {
- /* split into two entries */
+ /* split into two entries - we need a new resource */
if (!new_res) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- break;
+ new_res = alloc_resource(GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!new_res) {
+ alloc_nofail = true;
+ write_unlock(&resource_lock);
+ goto retry;
+ }
}
new_res->name = res->name;
new_res->start = end + 1;
@@ -1339,9 +1348,8 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
new_res->sibling = res->sibling;
new_res->child = NULL;
- ret = __adjust_resource(res, res->start,
- start - res->start);
- if (ret)
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(__adjust_resource(res, res->start,
+ start - res->start)))
break;
res->sibling = new_res;
new_res = NULL;
@@ -1352,7 +1360,6 @@ int release_mem_region_adjustable(struct resource *parent,
write_unlock(&resource_lock);
free_resource(new_res);
- return ret;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTREMOVE */
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index baded53b9ff92..4c47b68a9f4b5 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1724,26 +1724,6 @@ void try_offline_node(int nid)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(try_offline_node);
-static void __release_memory_resource(resource_size_t start,
- resource_size_t size)
-{
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * When removing memory in the same granularity as it was added,
- * this function never fails. It might only fail if resources
- * have to be adjusted or split. We'll ignore the error, as
- * removing of memory cannot fail.
- */
- ret = release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size);
- if (ret) {
- resource_size_t endres = start + size - 1;
-
- pr_warn("Unable to release resource <%pa-%pa> (%d)\n",
- &start, &endres, ret);
- }
-}
-
static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
{
int rc = 0;
@@ -1777,7 +1757,7 @@ static int __ref try_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
memblock_remove(start, size);
}
- __release_memory_resource(start, size);
+ release_mem_region_adjustable(&iomem_resource, start, size);
try_offline_node(nid);
--
2.26.2
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-10 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-10 9:13 [PATCH v3 0/7] mm/memory_hotplug: selective merging of system ram resources David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-09-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] kernel/resource: move and rename IORESOURCE_MEM_DRIVER_MANAGED David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm/memory_hotplug: prepare passing flags to add_memory() and friends David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 9:53 ` Pankaj Gupta
2020-09-11 2:21 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-11 8:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-15 8:46 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm/memory_hotplug: MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE to specify merging of System RAM resources David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 10:03 ` Pankaj Gupta
2020-09-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] virtio-mem: try to merge system ram resources David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 10:10 ` Pankaj Gupta
2020-09-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] xen/balloon: " David Hildenbrand
2020-09-10 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] hv_balloon: " David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200910091340.8654-2-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).