From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4FDC4CEC7 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCC05208E4 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:34:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CCC05208E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EF3202E6DFF; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=216.40.44.247; helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com; envelope-from=joe@perches.com; receiver=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0247.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B32D202E291C for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E4E837F24A; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:34:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: wood38_47427da86d73d X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1803 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.152.152]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4299c79e33f22e237e42515ea436f187d8beb32e.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 0/3] Maintainer Entry Profiles From: Joe Perches To: Bart Van Assche , "Martin K. Petersen" , Dan Williams Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:34:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: <74984dc0-d5e4-f272-34b9-9a78619d5a83@acm.org> References: <156821692280.2951081.18036584954940423225.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <6fe45562-9493-25cf-afdb-6c0e702a49b4@acm.org> <44c08faf43fa77fb271f8dbb579079fb09007716.camel@perches.com> <74984dc0-d5e4-f272-34b9-9a78619d5a83@acm.org> User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.1-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve French , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Dmitry Vyukov , "Tobin C. Harding" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 13:01 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Another argument in favor of W=1 is that the formatting of kernel-doc > headers is checked only if W=1 is passed to make. Actually, but for the fact there are far too many to generally enable that warning right now, (an x86-64 defconfig has more than 1000) that sounds pretty reasonable to me. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm