From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A11C433E1 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58F1619CA for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:28:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A58F1619CA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5B4100EF27B; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=riteshh@linux.ibm.com; receiver= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28327100EF264 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 08:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 12NFGQtq158809; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:27:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=HEgPNmOQ2fGg+4o6ggG+TNuvsojvFlxy9dBHlBe6Svc=; b=j6Axg86BIT6TdVpK3dBy599D+sEsSqA4nMaJjCiiop2oShxkrUfHnnN/Xd3h/Swxo7aa 5NKOVTNS1xlKE0pRfPk80TITeQTTiyDX19Dnq2BY0H3i2iy8EC2JnSL5ccfLWBgv394m ab5x/brQxo90AIXLxqy2cFVgak4tCpENma9XCPf+ub+FBQ1D7d2OKK2ItTEFC/J6xGI2 1xzVmwJQR9UAg+rnRwKM2mZ5SzMiZk7aJ6Yj+jPpon/fTZk3u/DB6Vfmq8jCRG2CeNxl jpZEhKAeKLRcD3BG+t2CpzLz6jFlUKn0Cj93iuW7UNljsWf/qS7i2lfaigmROHE9DZ5Q MA== Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 37fjth8dmw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:27:59 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 12NFLY4H007748; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:27:57 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 37d99xhtu1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:27:57 +0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 12NFRs1e30146828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:27:54 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B779A52052; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:27:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.34.65] (unknown [9.199.34.65]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280B65205A; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] fsdax,xfs: Add reflink&dedupe support for fsdax To: Shiyang Ruan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210319015237.993880-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> From: Ritesh Harjani Message-ID: <7f9d5477-b156-e084-9412-307dd67149b1@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:57:50 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210319015237.993880-1-ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com> Content-Language: en-US X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369,18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-23_06:2021-03-22,2021-03-23 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103230112 Message-ID-Hash: WGOAGNGWQNUWIR7SI6U5RB7O2OXDVFBU X-Message-ID-Hash: WGOAGNGWQNUWIR7SI6U5RB7O2OXDVFBU X-MailFrom: riteshh@linux.ibm.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: darrick.wong@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, david@fromorbit.com, hch@lst.de, rgoldwyn@suse.de X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 3/19/21 7:22 AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote: > From: Shiyang Ruan > > This patchset is attempt to add CoW support for fsdax, and take XFS, > which has both reflink and fsdax feature, as an example. Thanks for the patchset. I have tried reviewing the series from logical correctness and to some extent functional correctness. Since I am not well versed with the core functionality of COW operation, so I may have requested for some clarifications where I could not get the code 100% on what it is doing. > > (Rebased on v5.11) > == > Thanks. Yes, I see some conflicts when tried to apply on latest kernel. -ritesh _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org