From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align()
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:38:57 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fterrmau.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158291748226.1609624.8971922874557923784.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> The pmem driver on PowerPC crashes with the following signature when
> instantiating misaligned namespaces that map their capacity via
> memremap_pages().
>
> BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access at 0xc001000406000000
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000090790
> NIP [c000000000090790] arch_add_memory+0xc0/0x130
> LR [c000000000090744] arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130
> Call Trace:
> arch_add_memory+0x74/0x130 (unreliable)
> memremap_pages+0x74c/0xa30
> devm_memremap_pages+0x3c/0xa0
> pmem_attach_disk+0x188/0x770
> nvdimm_bus_probe+0xd8/0x470
>
> With the assumption that only memremap_pages() has alignment
> constraints, enforce memremap_compat_align() for
> pmem_should_map_pages(), nd_pfn, and nd_dax cases. This includes
> preventing the creation of namespaces where the base address is
> misaligned and cases there infoblock padding parameters are invalid.
>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
> Fixes: a3619190d62e ("libnvdimm/pfn: stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> index 032dc61725ff..68e89855f779 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/namespace_devs.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/nd.h>
> #include "nd-core.h"
> #include "pmem.h"
> +#include "pfn.h"
> #include "nd.h"
>
> static void namespace_io_release(struct device *dev)
> @@ -1739,6 +1740,17 @@ struct nd_namespace_common *nvdimm_namespace_common_probe(struct device *dev)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> }
May be add a comment here that both dax/fsdax namespace details are
checked in nd_pfn_validate() so that we look at start_pad and end_trunc
while validating the namespace?
>
> + if (pmem_should_map_pages(dev)) {
> + struct nd_namespace_io *nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> + struct resource *res = &nsio->res;
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(res->start | (res->end + 1),
> + memremap_compat_align())) {
> + dev_err(&ndns->dev, "%pr misaligned, unable to map\n", res);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (is_namespace_pmem(&ndns->dev)) {
> struct nd_namespace_pmem *nspm;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> index 79fe02d6f657..3bdd4b883d05 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
> @@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ static bool nd_supported_alignment(unsigned long align)
> int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig)
> {
> u64 checksum, offset;
> + struct resource *res;
> enum nd_pfn_mode mode;
> struct nd_namespace_io *nsio;
> unsigned long align, start_pad;
> @@ -578,13 +579,14 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig)
> * established.
> */
> nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
> - if (offset >= resource_size(&nsio->res)) {
> + res = &nsio->res;
> + if (offset >= resource_size(res)) {
> dev_err(&nd_pfn->dev, "pfn array size exceeds capacity of %s\n",
> dev_name(&ndns->dev));
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> - if ((align && !IS_ALIGNED(nsio->res.start + offset + start_pad, align))
> + if ((align && !IS_ALIGNED(res->start + offset + start_pad, align))
> || !IS_ALIGNED(offset, PAGE_SIZE)) {
> dev_err(&nd_pfn->dev,
> "bad offset: %#llx dax disabled align: %#lx\n",
> @@ -592,6 +594,18 @@ int nd_pfn_validate(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn, const char *sig)
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
>
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(res->start + le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->start_pad),
> + memremap_compat_align())) {
> + dev_err(&nd_pfn->dev, "resource start misaligned\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(res->end + 1 - le32_to_cpu(pfn_sb->end_trunc),
> + memremap_compat_align())) {
> + dev_err(&nd_pfn->dev, "resource end misaligned\n");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(nd_pfn_validate);
> @@ -750,7 +764,13 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
> start = nsio->res.start;
> size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
> npfns = PHYS_PFN(size - SZ_8K);
> - align = max(nd_pfn->align, SUBSECTION_SIZE);
> + align = max(nd_pfn->align, memremap_compat_align());
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, memremap_compat_align())) {
> + dev_err(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s: start %pa misaligned to %#lx\n",
> + dev_name(&ndns->dev), &start,
> + memremap_compat_align());
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
This validates start in case of a new namespace creation where the user
updated nd_region->align value? A comment there would help when looking
at the code later?
> end_trunc = start + size - ALIGN_DOWN(start + size, align);
> if (nd_pfn->mode == PFN_MODE_PMEM) {
> /*
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 19:17 [PATCH v3 0/5] libnvdimm: Cross-arch compatible namespace alignment Dan Williams
2020-02-28 19:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mm/memremap_pages: Introduce memremap_compat_align() Dan Williams
2020-03-02 12:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-28 19:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] libnvdimm/pfn: Prevent raw mode fallback if pfn-infoblock valid Dan Williams
2020-03-02 12:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-02-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] libnvdimm/namespace: Enforce memremap_compat_align() Dan Williams
2020-03-02 12:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2020-03-02 18:45 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] libnvdimm/region: Introduce NDD_LABELING Dan Williams
2020-02-28 19:18 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] libnvdimm/region: Introduce an 'align' attribute Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fterrmau.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).