From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] nvdimm: Use more common kernel coding style
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:42:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72==rV-CY5d3poN6j10qSuF2ux-sJGqZS+YOXeZgGmmh3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be3c626c2e9d14fe2fa9d0403bc02832231cc437.camel@perches.com>
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:15 AM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>
> I am adding Miguel Ojeda to the cc's.
Thanks Joe!
> Of course you are welcome to try it, but I believe that
> clang-format doesn't work all that well yet.
>
> It's more a work in progress rather than a "standard".
>
> I believe you'll find that the patch series I sent
> ends up with a rather more typical kernel style.
>
> I suggest you try to apply the series I sent and then
> run clang-format on that and see the differences.
Indeed, it is not there just yet. There are a few differences w.r.t.
the kernel style that aren't supported yet. However, for block/batch
conversions, it is very useful.
Luckily, one of the biggest ones (the consecutive macros alignment,
and we have a lot of them given this is C and a kernel) is going away
with LLVM 9 which is about to be released next week.
> Ideally one day, something tool like clang-format
> might be locally applied by every developer for their
> own personal style with some other neutral style the
> content actually distributed.
If that day comes, I hope we can all agree to a single format and
apply it everywhere as other major projects have done. I think
agreeing to a given style is much, much easier for any of us when
formatting is fully automatic -- because at that point you don't need
to spend mental cycles (and memory!) on it. :-)
If I had to guess, I would say the path forward will start with some
subsystem maintainers starting to apply clang-format systematically on
their trees. That is why I think it is very useful that Dan tries it
out and let us know his impressions.
Cheers,
Miguel
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-12 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-12 2:54 [PATCH 00/13] nvdimm: Use more common kernel coding style Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 01/13] nvdimm: Use more typical whitespace Joe Perches
2019-09-12 12:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-12 15:01 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-16 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 02/13] nvdimm: Move logical continuations to previous line Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 03/13] nvdimm: Use octal permissions Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 04/13] nvdimm: Use a more common kernel spacing style Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 05/13] nvdimm: Use "unsigned int" in preference to "unsigned" Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 06/13] nvdimm: Add and remove blank lines Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 07/13] nvdimm: Use typical kernel brace styles Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 08/13] nvdimm: Use typical kernel style indentation Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 09/13] nvdimm: btt.h: Neaten #defines to improve readability Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 10/13] nvdimm: namespace_devs: Move assignment operators Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 11/13] nvdimm: Use more common logic testing styles and bare ; positions Joe Perches
2019-09-12 3:52 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 12/13] nvdimm: namespace_devs: Change progess typo to progress Joe Perches
2019-09-12 2:54 ` [PATCH 13/13] nvdimm: Miscellaneous neatening Joe Perches
2019-09-12 8:00 ` [PATCH 00/13] nvdimm: Use more common kernel coding style Dan Williams
2019-09-12 8:15 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-12 8:42 ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2019-09-12 14:00 ` Jeff Moyer
2019-09-12 14:06 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2019-09-12 14:35 ` Dan Williams
2019-09-12 14:21 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-12 21:08 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-12 21:58 ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-09-12 22:15 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-12 22:38 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-12 23:00 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-12 23:07 ` Joe Perches
2019-09-12 22:58 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-09-12 23:26 ` clang-format and 'clang-format on' and 'clang-format off' Joe Perches
2019-09-15 18:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANiq72==rV-CY5d3poN6j10qSuF2ux-sJGqZS+YOXeZgGmmh3g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).