From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFBEC433B4 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:10:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9140661417 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 19:10:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9140661417 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A5D100EAB4D; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52b; helo=mail-ed1-x52b.google.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver= Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8DE9100EC1CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id i3so24924960edt.1 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:10:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NBcAuPkDB8yn7vxrbycYSSA5wndCepu03NrNjeW39ik=; b=pthqRNwvDGzcKw29vq+beBkIOvNN/fF7gZ2Xe3IXaGqVyzwBsLaqthgSuIMoUo8IW+ gumEibGbH+L9n3/IkDXke2EWisNXcNsuQf6FnbaaEy/QeVNwKXdGbkZ8gOO9PSRg/1tX kwpHvf8Dnvam7XnxffqBhiCqCrOzMrFlKJ0zzdSJYgIVgPVSylOM6txrHN/8UiwP6HfA yla17QS2aL3iB+isH0nkwPXzzVoti8Zr1k8OZUkULS65Qk4I6Ao+xwxtWVYQdJYqZq+u WaYCdpb8iRaFCZA0dUw7sziGDrn8XZ0N4rnmBOYyoVOkjZHatSAF/GDUpT6/5BGbcEFC b0/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NBcAuPkDB8yn7vxrbycYSSA5wndCepu03NrNjeW39ik=; b=UFmhRRxDEXVI7dQtP2lXlJzOzO63AvRh3+I3fNZ/rcScSeVAMcKkxqs46Mcu5q6egc PibEpjiujSNjJ+2/m2mNglSp8hzAgajeTzNf3WMQbSelcuQtiLsLDLYUBdJKFmQgvMBH Y/DrdsCvRMGu6VfulSpjt0CaD/qgXRRXDZiLpIMN3U9UPvRRGsWZbvADqb5r6xhjcb03 LKQ/xANc1Qs8vf1DsIbOo9jkpfWPML+BAVXm5Uvep+Xo5OOXGdnvWtxqPRMX2lnMNIhL htlxm40fNKsiSXil93+Z73y706HpYaVOmAIpq+nNeU/kM+FpeMSCk02QZK53iwKSXXc4 XPOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XTRxLIv/JuJxTF6B7r4ZW6eX0ngKoo/t1wOLVBWNC67Q0hOk4 zpvaar5pIlnEwpvfSBBcVW7Jqm+gwizgwdQxinTDBg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUzvWoqsHVgj6q4VHtvt/KU0qakEZL3zMXCyN6iQAH2qDqBVdMEkOUp4sI5gEzwoBW8HbVmWc5LR0glCxieKk= X-Received: by 2002:a50:e607:: with SMTP id y7mr40985113edm.18.1619032201627; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:10:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210419213636.1514816-1-vgoyal@redhat.com> <20210419213636.1514816-3-vgoyal@redhat.com> <20210420093420.2eed3939@bahia.lan> <20210420140033.GA1529659@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210420140033.GA1529659@redhat.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:09:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH v3 2/3] dax: Add a wakeup mode parameter to put_unlocked_entry() To: Vivek Goyal Message-ID-Hash: DM56LTNCLWWF7MILCB4E665BFZ4IDAPC X-Message-ID-Hash: DM56LTNCLWWF7MILCB4E665BFZ4IDAPC X-MailFrom: dan.j.williams@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Greg Kurz , linux-fsdevel , Jan Kara , Matthew Wilcox , linux-nvdimm , Miklos Szeredi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , virtio-fs-list X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 7:01 AM Vivek Goyal wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:34:20AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:36:35 -0400 > > Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > As of now put_unlocked_entry() always wakes up next waiter. In next > > > patches we want to wake up all waiters at one callsite. Hence, add a > > > parameter to the function. > > > > > > This patch does not introduce any change of behavior. > > > > > > Suggested-by: Dan Williams > > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal > > > --- > > > fs/dax.c | 13 +++++++------ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c > > > index 00978d0838b1..f19d76a6a493 100644 > > > --- a/fs/dax.c > > > +++ b/fs/dax.c > > > @@ -275,11 +275,12 @@ static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry) > > > finish_wait(wq, &ewait.wait); > > > } > > > > > > -static void put_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry) > > > +static void put_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, > > > + enum dax_entry_wake_mode mode) > > > { > > > /* If we were the only waiter woken, wake the next one */ > > > > With this change, the comment is no longer accurate since the > > function can now wake all waiters if passed mode == WAKE_ALL. > > Also, it paraphrases the code which is simple enough, so I'd > > simply drop it. > > > > This is minor though and it shouldn't prevent this fix to go > > forward. > > > > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz > > Ok, here is the updated patch which drops that comment line. > > Vivek Hi Vivek, Can you get in the habit of not replying inline with new patches like this? Collect the review feedback, take a pause, and resend the full series so tooling like b4 and patchwork can track when a new posting supersedes a previous one. As is, this inline style inflicts manual effort on the maintainer. > > Subject: dax: Add a wakeup mode parameter to put_unlocked_entry() > > As of now put_unlocked_entry() always wakes up next waiter. In next > patches we want to wake up all waiters at one callsite. Hence, add a > parameter to the function. > > This patch does not introduce any change of behavior. > > Suggested-by: Dan Williams > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal > --- > fs/dax.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > Index: redhat-linux/fs/dax.c > =================================================================== > --- redhat-linux.orig/fs/dax.c 2021-04-20 09:55:45.105069893 -0400 > +++ redhat-linux/fs/dax.c 2021-04-20 09:56:27.685822730 -0400 > @@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ static void wait_entry_unlocked(struct x > finish_wait(wq, &ewait.wait); > } > > -static void put_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry) > +static void put_unlocked_entry(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, > + enum dax_entry_wake_mode mode) > { > - /* If we were the only waiter woken, wake the next one */ > if (entry && !dax_is_conflict(entry)) > - dax_wake_entry(xas, entry, WAKE_NEXT); > + dax_wake_entry(xas, entry, mode); > } > > /* > @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ struct page *dax_layout_busy_page_range( > entry = get_unlocked_entry(&xas, 0); > if (entry) > page = dax_busy_page(entry); > - put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry); > + put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry, WAKE_NEXT); > if (page) > break; > if (++scanned % XA_CHECK_SCHED) > @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static int __dax_invalidate_entry(struct > mapping->nrexceptional--; > ret = 1; > out: > - put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry); > + put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry, WAKE_NEXT); > xas_unlock_irq(&xas); > return ret; > } > @@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ static int dax_writeback_one(struct xa_s > return ret; > > put_unlocked: > - put_unlocked_entry(xas, entry); > + put_unlocked_entry(xas, entry, WAKE_NEXT); > return ret; > } > > @@ -1695,7 +1695,7 @@ dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite(struct vm_fault * > /* Did we race with someone splitting entry or so? */ > if (!entry || dax_is_conflict(entry) || > (order == 0 && !dax_is_pte_entry(entry))) { > - put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry); > + put_unlocked_entry(&xas, entry, WAKE_NEXT); > xas_unlock_irq(&xas); > trace_dax_insert_pfn_mkwrite_no_entry(mapping->host, vmf, > VM_FAULT_NOPAGE); > _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org