From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41030C4741F for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ml01.01.org (ml01.01.org [198.145.21.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08FB221EB for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="QEiJCmMJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E08FB221EB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-nvdimm-bounces@lists.01.org Received: from ml01.vlan13.01.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743971459414D; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::544; helo=mail-ed1-x544.google.com; envelope-from=dan.j.williams@intel.com; receiver= Received: from mail-ed1-x544.google.com (mail-ed1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::544]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB5BE13F8350E for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x544.google.com with SMTP id j2so17986458eds.9 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=63NW9gk7HRpDHGoorZLXSxJtBEzJkCrOurZGFYdeq1s=; b=QEiJCmMJ+abH4jXWF874MeS11eIiKXKE3h+n39sqAGLPIycrn0MxhLfS6Wo+aHjo6o BgjErpz4dkHZ481e5ATkWq93dIaYf6zudSHfhcDNkoV5W8p3tDbaqO0s4spGS+JLBOVL xn4KEw0MJ1HUUzUo1qdlmI3HLQin57sr4yXqNNwLYhvbPhHVBqnKcLDYDRBfUSirJosj 6VaWUYcV9FK1rBmUDtcRLgsOTXJ8dZ55TiXMjedniQ+O9jvUR4qfgY1xDTm4+TC3Ugui fAgPDzIRGT2lufyhiDkf+4OuUSwYygqW1DEk06diJYWny7csi55q33hB6fNRubbxlgJ1 Vk+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=63NW9gk7HRpDHGoorZLXSxJtBEzJkCrOurZGFYdeq1s=; b=FOJefA8FGJEo8/ksH9sMb6TgxaXV+tJd23gtRJLfhb/ZlCLP1UDhjCPnZkl4mex9RZ JRI9QIRw2UBa/kPKtEWkQs/UvRZXZgcbLmhErzIuRNphPpwV2r+xM1LILdai+3EURqbv 2ni5xIMBByhq/fh9AeIZGzWFdegkOR8GfHXD/8bpWf21WPsLa/2BYfw3UH2ZbIK5C8ff MVTjC0oYDMjhwB/3HZnWszfgZcCBsf179VTdCTbb+BOK+Gk1+doFRxbvejhRx1M9BADR 6ip2QQlRmZcRHOODPlqsbLuwrFPxbxoSNPAxwLHd2ALE4DMt4oVD8odAQYjeKrMvP805 XkoA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+cncDuARMx62be2d17CVBVdcfMxEo/H3vVDk4isAp4bUGqSmy g2GjmlVemnCe6f+byUk8FxeggIeiDoDWoZBiroYYSw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEyMjaWBOlTNqZq+aOqsUhRrRJuhmMZTQc6iiISsny0Ld0R8ZOQAu5Co8gVaeeYbMO5GjUCtpLRRG7qTwcHRY= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c511:: with SMTP id o17mr7090354edq.300.1600821793001; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <159643094279.4062302.17779410714418721328.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20200821162134.97d551c6fe45b489992841a8@linux-foundation.org> <7d51834a-9544-b2e8-bfba-1c3e2da0e470@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <7d51834a-9544-b2e8-bfba-1c3e2da0e470@redhat.com> From: Dan Williams Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:43:01 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] device-dax: Support sub-dividing soft-reserved ranges To: David Hildenbrand Message-ID-Hash: VOSWB7EXJCSU2564JY7RIRBMEEQJXN3D X-Message-ID-Hash: VOSWB7EXJCSU2564JY7RIRBMEEQJXN3D X-MailFrom: dan.j.williams@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: Andrew Morton , Ard Biesheuvel , Mike Rapoport , Borislav Petkov , David Airlie , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Ard Biesheuvel , Joao Martins , Tom Lendacky , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jonathan Cameron , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Pavel Tatashin , Peter Zijlstra , Ben Skeggs , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jason Gunthorpe , Jia He , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Paul Mackerras , Brice Goglin , Michael Ellerman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Vetter , Andy Lutomirski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux MM , linux-nvdimm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ACPI , Maling list - DRI developers , Zhen Lei X-Mailman-Version: 3.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Linux-nvdimm developer list." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 3:46 AM David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 22.08.20 01:21, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:53:57 -0700 Dan Williams wrote: > > > >>> I think I am missing some important pieces. Bear with me. > >> > >> No worries, also bear with me, I'm going to be offline intermittently > >> until at least mid-September. Hopefully Joao and/or Vishal can jump in > >> on this discussion. > > > > Ordinarily I'd prefer a refresh&resend for 2+ week-old series such as > > this. > > > > But given that v4 all applies OK and that Dan has pending outages, I'll > > scoop up this version, even though at least one change has been suggested. > > > > Should I try to fix patch #11 while Dan is away? Because I think at > least two things in there are wrong (and it would have been better to > split that patch into reviewable pieces). Hey David, Back now, I'll take a look. I didn't immediately see a way to meaningfully break up that patch without some dead-code steps in the conversion, but I'll take another run at it. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvdimm mailing list -- linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org To unsubscribe send an email to linux-nvdimm-leave@lists.01.org